The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
THE PROGRESSION OF THE PATHOLOGICAL CHANGES OF ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE IN FRONTAL AND TEMPORAL NEOCORTEX EXAMINED BOTH AT BIOPSY AND AT AUTOPSY
Abstract
The progression of the pathological changes of Alzheimer's disease in frontal and temporal neocortex examined both at biopsy and at autopsy Brains were obtained at autopsy from five patients with Alzheimer's disease, each of whom had undergone diagnostic craniotomy 3–7 years previously. It was possible, therefore, to examine the number (density) and nucleolar volume of pyramidal nerve cells, and the density of senile plaques and neurofibrillary tangles within the cerebral cortex on two occasions during the progression of their illness, and to assess how these measures might have changed during the period between biopsy and death. In all five patients, at biopsy, the density and the nucleolar volume of pyramidal nerve cells was significantly less than controls and, in general, values for both these measures fell significantly further from biopsy to death. By contrast, in none of the five patients did senile plaque density consistently change from biopsy to death; neurofibrillary tangle density either did not change, or indeed sometimes decreased from biopsy to death. These data show that both the clinical and the pathological progression of Alzheimer's disease is marked by a continuing loss of pyramidal cells from frontal and temporal cortex, although the densities of plaques and tangles within the cortex do not, per se, correlate with the stage of the illness. The usefulness of measurement of plaque and tangle densities as pathological criteria by which the clinical and neurochemical deficits of Alzheimer's disease can be compared in different patients is clearly questionable.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Blessed, G., Tomlinson, B. E., & Roth, M. (1968) · British Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1192/bjp.114.512.797 · Cited by 4,117
Cited by
Terry, R. D., Masliah, E., Salmon, D. P., Butters, N., DeTeresa, R., Hill, R., Hansen, L. A., & Katzman, R. (1991) · Annals of Neurology · doi:10.1002/ana.410300410 · Cited by 4,397
Synapse loss in frontal cortex biopsies in Alzheimer's disease: Correlation with cognitive severity
DeKosky, S. T., & Scheff, S. W. (1990) · Annals of Neurology · doi:10.1002/ana.410270502 · Cited by 2,376
Longitudinal assessment of Aβ and cognition in aging and Alzheimer disease
Villemagne, V. L., Pike, K. E., Chételat, G., Ellis, K. A., Mulligan, R. S., Bourgeat, P., Ackermann, U., Jones, G., Szoeke, C., Salvado, O., et al. (2011) · Annals of Neurology · doi:10.1002/ana.22248 · Cited by 833
Uchida, Y., Takio, K., Titani, K., Ihara, Y., & Tomonaga, M. (1991) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/0896-6273(91)90272-2 · Cited by 699
MUTANT GENES IN FAMILIAL ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE AND TRANSGENIC MODELS
Price, D. L., & Sisodia, S. S. (1998) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev.neuro.21.1.479 · Cited by 572
Metadata
- Authors
- MANN, D. M. A., MARCYNIUK, B., YATES, P. O., NEARY, D., & SNOWDEN, J. S.
- Venue
- Neuropathology and Applied Neurobiology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1988-06
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 177-195
- ISSN
- 0305-1846 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2990
- OpenAlex
- W1967380205
- Cited by
- 162
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 7.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: THE PROGRESSION OF THE PATHOLOGICAL CHANGES OF ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE IN FRONTAL AND TEMPORAL NEOCORTEX EXAMINED BOTH AT BIOPSY AND AT AUTOPSY. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2990.1988.tb00880.x
- The paper
- MANN, D. M. A., MARCYNIUK, B., YATES, P. O., NEARY, D., & SNOWDEN, J. S. (1988). THE PROGRESSION OF THE PATHOLOGICAL CHANGES OF ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE IN FRONTAL AND TEMPORAL NEOCORTEX EXAMINED BOTH AT BIOPSY AND AT AUTOPSY. Neuropathology and Applied Neurobiology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2990.1988.tb00880.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.