The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Imaging of iron oxide nanoparticles by MR and light microscopy in patients with malignant brain tumours
Abstract
Objective: Ferumoxtran‐10 (Combidex®), a dextran‐coated iron oxide nanoparticle, provides enhancement of intracranial tumours by magnetic resonance (MR) for more than 24 h and can be imaged histologically by iron staining. Our goal was to compare ferumoxtran imaging and histochemistry vs. gadolinium enhancement in malignant brain tumours on preoperative and postoperative MR. Methods: Seven patients with primary and metastatic malignant tumours underwent MR imaging with gadolinium and ferumoxtran both pre‐ and postoperatively. Normalized signal intensities on the ferumoxtran‐enhanced scans were determined in representative regions of interest. Resected tissue from six ferumoxtran patients and from three patients who did not receive ferumoxtran was assessed for localization of iron in tumour and reactive brain. Results: All malignant tumours (all of which enhanced by gadolinium MR) showed ferumoxtran accumulation with T1 and T2 signal changes, even using a 0.15 T intraoperative MR unit in one patient. Iron staining was predominantly in reactive cells (reactive astrocytes and macrophages) and not tumour cells. In five of the seven patients, including two patients who showed additional lesions, areas enhancing with ferumoxtran but not with gadolinium were observed. Comparison of the pre‐ and postoperative MR revealed residual ferumoxtran‐enhancing areas in four of seven cases. Conclusion: In malignant tumours, ferumoxtran may show areas of enhancement, even with a 0.15 T intraoperative MR, that do not enhance with gadolinium. Ferumoxtran‐enhancing lesions have persistent increased T1 signal intensity for 2–5 days, which may provide advantages over gadolinium for postoperative imaging. Histochemistry for iron shows uptake of ferumoxtran in reactive cells (astrocytes and macrophages) rather than tumour cells.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Cancer nanotechnology: opportunities and challenges
Ferrari, M. (2005) · Nature Reviews Cancer · doi:10.1038/nrc1566 · Cited by 4,558
Magnetic nanoparticles in MR imaging and drug delivery
Sun, C., Lee, J. S. H., & Zhang, M. (2008) · Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.addr.2008.03.018 · Cited by 2,594
Reddy, L. H., Arias, J. L., Nicolas, J., & Couvreur, P. (2012) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr300068p · Cited by 2,010
Superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles: magnetic nanoplatforms as drug carriers
Wahajuddin, & Arora (2012) · International Journal of Nanomedicine · doi:10.2147/ijn.s30320 · Cited by 1,117
Toxicology and clinical potential of nanoparticles
Yildirimer, L., Thanh, N. T. K., Loizidou, M., & Seifalian, A. M. (2011) · Nano Today · doi:10.1016/j.nantod.2011.10.001 · Cited by 676
Metadata
- Authors
- Neuwelt, E. A., Várallyay, P., Bagó, A. G., Muldoon, L. L., Nesbit, G., & Nixon, R.
- Venue
- Neuropathology and Applied Neurobiology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2004-05-04
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 456-471
- ISSN
- 0305-1846 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2990
- OpenAlex
- W2006858976
- Cited by
- 219
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Imaging of iron oxide nanoparticles by MR and light microscopy in patients with malignant brain tumours. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2990.2004.00557.x
- The paper
- Neuwelt, E. A., Várallyay, P., Bagó, A. G., Muldoon, L. L., Nesbit, G., & Nixon, R. (2004). Imaging of iron oxide nanoparticles by MR and light microscopy in patients with malignant brain tumours. Neuropathology and Applied Neurobiology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2990.2004.00557.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.