The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A limiting dilution assay for quantifying Leishmania major in tissues of infected mice
Abstract
Summary A limiting dilution assay for the quantification of Leishmania major in infected mouse tissue was developed. The assay was found to be both sensitive and reliable, and, due to its design, could be scored either visually or following the incorporation of 3 H‐thymidine by the growing parasites. Results are presented in which the assay was employed to enumerate L. major in the tissues of susceptible (BALB/c) and resistant (CBA) mice at intervals after infection with L. major. It was found that parasites could be detected at the site of injection with L. major as early as 3 days after infection. By day 8, a substantial increase in the number of parasites at the lesion site had occurred in both strains of mice. Subsequently, whereas the number of parasites decreased in the lesions of CBA mice, their number steadily increased in the lesions of BALB/c mice. Parasites were detected in lymph nodes draining the lesion site in both BALB/c and CBA mice by 28 days after infection. Interestingly, a low number of L. major was found in the lymph nodes of CBA mice at 100 days after infection, a time when no parasites could be detected at the lesion site. Previous results from this laboratory have demonstrated that the adoptive transfer of L. major‐specific L3T4‐positive T‐cell populations exacerbated cutaneous lesions induced by L. major in BALB/c mice. Experiments presented here indicate that the adoptive transfer of L. major‐specific T‐cells also exacerbated cutaneous leishmaniasis in CBA mice. Using the sensitive limiting dilution assay presently described, it was found that this unexpected exacerbative effect of L. major‐specific T‐cells on lesion development was accompanied by a substantial increase in the number of parasites in the lesions of the adoptively transferred mice.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Belkaid, Y., Hoffmann, K. F., Mendez, S., Kamhawi, S., Udey, M. C., Wynn, T. A., & Sacks, D. L. (2001) · The Journal of Experimental Medicine · doi:10.1084/jem.194.10.1497 · Cited by 557
Laouar, Y., Sutterwala, F. S., Gorelik, L., & Flavell, R. A. (2005) · Nature Immunology · doi:10.1038/ni1197 · Cited by 451
Reactivation of latent leishmaniasis by inhibition of inducible nitric oxide synthase.
Stenger, S., Donhauser, N., Thüring, H., Röllinghoff, M., & Bogdan, C. (1996) · The Journal of experimental medicine · doi:10.1084/jem.183.4.1501 · Cited by 331
Persistence Without Pathology in Phosphoglycan-Deficient Leishmania major
Späth, G. F., Lye, L.-F., Segawa, H., Sacks, D. L., Turco, S. J., & Beverley, S. M. (2003) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1087499 · Cited by 167
Giese, N. A., Gabriele, L., Doherty, T. M., Klinman, D. M., Tadesse-Heath, L., Contursi, C., Epstein, S. L., & Morse, H. C. (1997) · The Journal of Experimental Medicine · doi:10.1084/jem.186.9.1535 · Cited by 160
Metadata
- Authors
- TITUS, R. G., MARCHAND, M., BOON, T., & LOUIS, J. A.
- Venue
- Parasite Immunology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1985-09
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 545-555
- ISSN
- 0141-9838 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-3024
- OpenAlex
- W1994879603
- Cited by
- 514
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A limiting dilution assay for quantifying Leishmania major in tissues of infected mice. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-3024.1985.tb00098.x
- The paper
- TITUS, R. G., MARCHAND, M., BOON, T., & LOUIS, J. A. (1985). A limiting dilution assay for quantifying Leishmania major in tissues of infected mice. Parasite Immunology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3024.1985.tb00098.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.