The DOI matches its Crossref record.
An airflow olfactometer for measuring olfactory responses of hymenopterous parasitoids and other small insects
Open accessAbstract
ABSTRACT. A new type of airflow olfactometer is described, and results given of experiments using it to measure behavioural olfactory responses of hymenopterous parasitoids. Compared with Y‐tube olfactometers it shows several advantages. In its exposure chamber four separate abutting odour fields are presented so that the test insect can readily enter and re‐enter them. More than one odour (or different concentrations of one odour) can be tested at the same time, thereby providing complex preference test situations. The various behavioural measures that can be assessed in the apparatus are examined and discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Aso, Y., Ray, R. P., Long, X., Bushey, D., Cichewicz, K., Ngo, T.-T., Sharp, B., Christoforou, C., Hu, A., Lemire, A. L., et al. (2019) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.49257 · Cited by 141
Metadata
- Authors
- VET, L. E. M., LENTEREN, J. C. V., HEYMANS, M., & MEELIS, E.
- Venue
- Physiological Entomology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1983-03
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 97-106
- ISSN
- 0307-6962 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-3032
- OpenAlex
- W2044894579
- Cited by
- 338
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 10.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
