The DOI matches its Crossref record; 27 of the 27 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Zigzagging and casting as a programmed response to wind‐borne odour: a review
Abstract
ABSTRACT. ‘Counterturning’ (meaning here the execution of a succession of alternating left and right turns) is the common feature in upwind zigzagging and cross‐wind casting by flying insects manoeuvring towards a small source of wind‐borne odour. Recent progress in understanding its control and function is discussed. Counterturning is internally controlled (‘self‐steered’) in the limited sense that, once initiated by a chemical stimulus, it continues without further changes in the chemical input both in clean air and in a homogeneous cloud of odour. As a reaction it appears to be the kind of chemotaxis distinguished as longitudinal klinotaxis, for which the stimulus is a difference of chemical concentration detected over time along the insect's path, not across it. The new directions taken in response to the stimulus, being self‐steered in the above sense, have no necessary relation to the direction of the chemical gradient that provided the stimulus but are influenced by the visual cues generated by wind drift. In wind, the counterturning programme is modulated by changes in the chemical input and simultaneously integrated with anemotaxis, but it can then continue in similar form after the wind has ceased. Unambiguous evidence for these conclusions is so far available only for certain flying male moths responding to sex pheromone. The primary function of counterturning, of all amplitudes and in both zigzagging and casting, appears to be the regaining of contact with an elusive scent.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The analysis of olfactory communication among animals
Bossert, W. H., & Wilson, E. O. (1963) · Journal of Theoretical Biology · doi:10.1016/0022-5193(63)90089-4 · Cited by 516
MURLIS, J., & JONES, C. D. (1981) · Physiological Entomology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-3032.1981.tb00262.x · Cited by 364
Pheromone-Regulated Anemotaxis in Flying Moths
Kennedy, J. S., & Marsh, D. (1974) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.184.4140.999 · Cited by 348
Self-citationThe Orientation of Animals, Kineses, Taxes and Compass Reactions,
Fraenkel (1961) · Cited by 296
Finding of a sex pheromone source by gypsy moths released in the field
David, C. T., Kennedy, J. S., & Ludlow, A. R. (1983) · Nature · doi:10.1038/303804a0 · Cited by 202
Self-citationThe concepts of olfactory ‘arrestment’ and ‘attraction’
KENNEDY, J. S. (1978) · Physiological Entomology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-3032.1978.tb00138.x · Cited by 202
Self-citationAn analysis of anemotactic zigzagging flight in male moths stimulated by pheromone
MARSH, D., KENNEDY, J. S., & LUDLOW, A. R. (1978) · Physiological Entomology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-3032.1978.tb00152.x · Cited by 195
Self-citationThe Olfactory Guidance of Flying Insects
Wright, R. H. (1958) · The Canadian Entomologist · doi:10.4039/ent9081-2 · Cited by 177
Guidance of flying male moths by wind‐borne sex pheromone
KENNEDY, J. S., LUDLOW, A. R., & SANDERS, C. J. (1981) · Physiological Entomology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-3032.1981.tb00655.x · Cited by 176
Self-citationMoth Sex Pheromones: An Evolutionary Perspective
Greenfield, M. D. (1981) · Florida Entomologist · doi:10.2307/3494597 · Cited by 159
Cited by
‘Infotaxis’ as a strategy for searching without gradients
Vergassola, M., Villermaux, E., & Shraiman, B. I. (2007) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature05464 · Cited by 890
Navigational Strategies Used by Insects to Find Distant, Wind-Borne Sources of Odor
Cardé, R. T., & Willis, M. A. (2008) · Journal of Chemical Ecology · doi:10.1007/s10886-008-9484-5 · Cited by 483
Fine-scale structure of pheromone plumes modulates upwind orientation of flying moths
Mafra-Neto, A., & Cardé, R. T. (1994) · Nature · doi:10.1038/369142a0 · Cited by 417
Free-flight responses of Drosophila melanogaster to attractive odors
Budick, S. A., & Dickinson, M. H. (2006) · Journal of Experimental Biology · doi:10.1242/jeb.02305 · Cited by 218
Plume-Tracking Behavior of Flying Drosophila Emerges from a Set of Distinct Sensory-Motor Reflexes
van Breugel, F., & Dickinson, M. H. (2014) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2013.12.023 · Cited by 217
Metadata
- Authors
- KENNEDY, J. S.
- Venue
- Physiological Entomology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1983-06
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 109-120
- ISSN
- 0307-6962 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-3032
- OpenAlex
- W2122746506
- Cited by
- 285
- References
- 27
- FWCI
- 21.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Zigzagging and casting as a programmed response to wind‐borne odour: a review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-3032.1983.tb00340.x
- The paper
- KENNEDY, J. S. (1983). Zigzagging and casting as a programmed response to wind‐borne odour: a review. Physiological Entomology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3032.1983.tb00340.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.