The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Guidance of flying male moths by wind‐borne sex pheromone
Abstract
ABSTRACT. On passing from clean air into a homogeneous cloud of sex pheromone in a wind tunnel flying male Adoxophyes orana (F.v.R.) (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) turned more or less upwind and reduced the time and distance between their switchings of track from one side of the wind line to the other. These responses became adapted under the constant pheromone stimulation in the cloud, thereby arresting upwind progress; but the adapted moths would now ‘lock‐on’ to an added pheromone plume and advance upwind along it. Moths also locked‐on to the border of a pheromone cloud, not by turning back on losing the scent as previously supposed but by initiating the above programme of small‐amplitude, crosswind movements (reversing anemomenotaxis). The onset and cessation of the pheromone stimulus produced anemotactic responses that differed quantitatively within a continuum, not two distinct kinds of response as previously supposed. The behavioural mechanism whereby uniform permeation of an area with synthetic sex pheromone can prevent males from finding females is reconsidered.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Navigational Strategies Used by Insects to Find Distant, Wind-Borne Sources of Odor
Cardé, R. T., & Willis, M. A. (2008) · Journal of Chemical Ecology · doi:10.1007/s10886-008-9484-5 · Cited by 483
Zigzagging and casting as a programmed response to wind‐borne odour: a review
KENNEDY, J. S. (1983) · Physiological Entomology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-3032.1983.tb00340.x · Cited by 285
Self-citationFree-flight responses of Drosophila melanogaster to attractive odors
Budick, S. A., & Dickinson, M. H. (2006) · Journal of Experimental Biology · doi:10.1242/jeb.02305 · Cited by 218
Odor Landscapes in Turbulent Environments
Celani, A., Villermaux, E., & Vergassola, M. (2014) · Physical Review X · doi:10.1103/physrevx.4.041015 · Cited by 203
Optimal policies for Bayesian olfactory search in turbulent flows
Heinonen, R. A., Biferale, L., Celani, A., & Vergassola, M. (2023) · Physical Review E · doi:10.1103/physreve.107.055105 · Cited by 19
Metadata
- Authors
- KENNEDY, J. S., LUDLOW, A. R., & SANDERS, C. J.
- Venue
- Physiological Entomology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1981-12
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 395-412
- ISSN
- 0307-6962 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-3032
- OpenAlex
- W1964049222
- Cited by
- 176
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 20.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Guidance of flying male moths by wind‐borne sex pheromone. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-3032.1981.tb00655.x
- The paper
- KENNEDY, J. S., LUDLOW, A. R., & SANDERS, C. J. (1981). Guidance of flying male moths by wind‐borne sex pheromone. Physiological Entomology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3032.1981.tb00655.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.