The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Fine structure of aphid stylet routes in plant tissues in correlation with EPG signals
Open accessAbstract
Abstract. Plant penetration by Aphis fabae (Scopoli) was recorded by the electrical penetration graph (EPG) technique and followed by stylectomy during wave‐forms that were suspected of indicating sieve element punctures. The severed stylets in the plant tissue were subsequently processed for transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and sectioned either transverse or longitudinal to the stylets. Two completely serially sectioned probes from the epidermis to the phloem were reconstructed. In one probe the stylet pathway went to a sieve element and showed many empty branches of salivary sheath material. Breaks in cell walls filled with sheath material demonstrated that the majority of cells bordering the track had been punctured, which supports earlier evidence from EPGs. All types of cells showed punctures and the highest number was found inside the vascular bundle. Very few cells died, which would appear to be important for virus transmission, and in others cellular reactions remained limited to some callose formation. The route of the stylets was intercellular and passed through the secondary wall material. The role of pectinase in intercellular penetration, and previous evidence for intracellular tracks are discussed. Most sieve elements had been punctured but only one was eventually accepted. Thus, reaching a sieve element in a host plant does not automatically imply its acceptance though the reason remains unclear. Gelation of phloem proteins was shown in the stylet canal. In a second probe, plant cytological and morphological correlations with the EPG were emphasized. Probes by other aphid‐plant combinations showed great similarity.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Molecular sabotage of plant defense by aphid saliva
Will, T., Tjallingii, W. F., Thönnessen, A., & van Bel, A. J. E. (2007) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0703535104 · Cited by 527
Self-citationThe Nutritional Physiology of Aphids
Douglas, A. E. (2003) · Advances in Insect Physiology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2806(03)31002-1 · Cited by 271
Genetic architecture of plant stress resistance: Multi-trait genome-wide association mapping
Thoen, M. P. M., Davila Olivas, N. H., Kloth, K. J., Coolen, S., Huang, P., Aarts, M. G. M., Bac‐Molenaar, J. A., Bakker, J., Bouwmeester, H. J., Broekgaarden, C., et al. (2017) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/nph.14220 · Cited by 188
“Parasitic plants and aphids have in common that they target phloem and xylem tissue (Tjallingii & Hogen Esch, 1993; Dorr & Kollmann, 1995), and induce the SA phytohormonal pathway (De Vos et al. , 2005; Runyon et al. , 2008).”
Chrzanowski, G., Leszczyński, B., Czerniewicz, P., Sytykiewicz, H., Matok, H., Krzyżanowski, R., & Sempruch, C. (2012) · Crop Protection · doi:10.1016/j.cropro.2012.01.005 · Cited by 61
Reactive Oxygen Species in Plant Interactions With Aphids
Goggin, F. L., & Fischer, H. D. (2022) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2021.811105 · Cited by 55
Metadata
- Authors
- TJALLINGII, W. F., & ESCH, T. H.
- Venue
- Physiological Entomology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1993-09
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 317-328
- ISSN
- 0307-6962 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-3032
- OpenAlex
- W2047624378
- Cited by
- 609
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 15.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Fine structure of aphid stylet routes in plant tissues in correlation with EPG signals. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-3032.1993.tb00604.x
- The paper
- TJALLINGII, W. F., & ESCH, T. H. (1993). Fine structure of aphid stylet routes in plant tissues in correlation with EPG signals. Physiological Entomology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3032.1993.tb00604.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.