Cited by 71Insect Pheromone Research and ControlMosquito-borne diseases and controlNeurobiology and Insect Physiology Research

A behavioural and electrophysiological study of ovi position cues for Culex quinquefasciatus

BLACKWELL1, A., (LUNTZ), A. J. MORDUE, HANSSON, B. S., WADHAMS, L. J., PICKETT, J. A.·1993·Physiological Entomology

Abstract

Abstract. Both the synthetic oviposition pheromone, erythro‐6‐acetoxy‐5‐hexa‐decanolide (0.01–80 μg) and a polluted water sample (0.01–80%) significantly increased oviposition by gravid female Culex quinquefasciatus Say (Diptera: Culicidae) in a laboratory assay against clean water. An additive effect resulted when 0.05 μg oviposition pheromone was combined with the polluted water dilution series. Undiluted, however, both the oviposition pheromone and the polluted water sample, alone and in combination, reduced the oviposition response to control levels. A previously reported oviposition site odour component, 3‐methylindole, also significantly increased oviposition at 1 × 10 _8 to 1 × 10 ‐7 g but at 1 × 10 _7 g significantly less oviposition occurred than in control treatments. The biological activities of the compounds were additionally evaluated electrophysiologically by an EAG assay. Female mosquitoes were electrophysiologically sensitive to the oviposition cues, both pheromone and habitat‐related; EAG responses of males were considerably lower than of females with 3‐methylindole.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-3032.1993.tb00607.x

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
BLACKWELL1, A., (LUNTZ), A. J. M., HANSSON, B. S., WADHAMS, L. J., & PICKETT, J. A.
Affiliations
  • Lund University (SE)
  • Rothamsted Research (GB)
Venue
Physiological Entomology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1993-12
Volume
18
Issue
4
Pages
343-348
ISSN
  • 0307-6962 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-3032
OpenAlex
W2009146354
Cited by
71
References
27
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 4
FWCI
2.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Physiological Entomology (publishedVersion)
  • Rothamsted Repository (Rothamsted Repository) (submittedVersion)
Funders
London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Insect Science › Insect Pheromone Research and Control
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Mosquito-borne diseases and control
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research
Keywords
Culex quinquefasciatus, oviposition behaviour, skatole, contaminated water, oviposition site selection, electroantennogram response, mosquito reproduction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review