The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Partitioning stomatal and non‐stomatal limitations to photosynthesis
Abstract
Abstract. Plant scientists concerned both with crop improvement and with understanding the control mechanisms of complex processes such as photosynthesis need to identify those processes that are most important in restricting the overall rate and to quantify the relative importance of different components. The techniques that have been used for quantifying the relative importance of component processes in limiting net assimilation rate are reviewed and related to a fundamental definition based on sensitivity analysis. It is concluded that many methods currently in use, including standard resistance analysis, frequently give very misleading answers. In addition, possible methods for apportioning the contributions of different component processes to observed changes in net photosynthetic rate (for example after stress) are also reviewed and compared against a fundamental approach based on sensitivity analysis. Unfortunately, the detailed time course of changes in mesophyll and stomatal properties that is required for application of the basic sensitivity analysis is seldom likely to be available, so that it is usually necessary to adopt an approximate method. The standard approximation that is recommended for calculating the contributions of different component processes to a change in assimilation rate, involves measurements at the initial and final states only. The various methods discussed in this paper are compared using published photosynthetic data for a range of species.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Lawlor, D. W., & Cornic, G. (2002) · Plant, Cell & Environment · doi:10.1046/j.0016-8025.2001.00814.x · Cited by 1,994
GRASSI, G., & MAGNANI, F. (2005) · Plant, Cell & Environment · doi:10.1111/j.1365-3040.2005.01333.x · Cited by 820
Stomatal control of photosynthesis and transpiration
Jones, H. (1998) · Journal of Experimental Botany · doi:10.1093/jexbot/49.suppl_1.387 · Cited by 616
Self-citationGalmés, J., Medrano, H., & Flexas, J. (2007) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.2007.02087.x · Cited by 609
Effects of climate warming on photosynthesis in boreal tree species depend on soil moisture
Reich, P. B., Sendall, K. M., Stefanski, A., Rich, R. L., Hobbie, S. E., & Montgomery, R. A. (2018) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-018-0582-4 · Cited by 451
Metadata
- Authors
- JONES, H. G.
- Venue
- Plant, Cell & Environment
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1985-03
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 95-104
- ISSN
- 0140-7791 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-3040
- OpenAlex
- W2053971739
- Cited by
- 280
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Partitioning stomatal and non‐stomatal limitations to photosynthesis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-3040.1985.tb01227.x
- The paper
- JONES, H. G. (1985). Partitioning stomatal and non‐stomatal limitations to photosynthesis. Plant, Cell & Environment. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3040.1985.tb01227.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.