The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The function, action and adaptive significance of phytochrome in light‐grown plants
Abstract
Abstract.It has previously been proposed that the fundamental function of phytochrome in the natural environment is the perception of the relative proportions of red and far‐red light, i.e. the red: far‐red ratio. This paper re‐evaluates this hypothesis, for vegetative green plants, in the light of recent findings. Essentially, three issues are considered: (a) the modulation of the response to red: far‐red by fluence rate: (b) the anticipation of competition for light by perception of changes in red: far‐red that precede actual shading: and (c) characteristics of phytochrome that may be important in the mechanism of photoperception (i.e. the accumulation of photoconversion intermediates, and the stability of Pfr). We conclude: (a) the red: far‐red ratio provides a reliable signal of plant density, even before shading by neighbours occurs: (b) plants are able to perceive and respond to these signals, and that possible ambiguities due to low red: far‐red at low solar angles may be avoided by modulation of the perception process by fluence‐rate dependent mechanisms; (c) although direct experimental evidence does not yet exist, circumstantial evidence suggests that the perception of red: far‐red may confer positive adaptive advantage; and (d) plants of certain species perceive and respond to fluence rate changes, mediated perhaps by a blue‐light absorbing photoreceptor or by phytochrome, but that these responses do not necessarily lead to shade avoidance reactions and their ecological relevance is not fully understood.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Tucker, D. J., & Mansfield, T. A. (1971) · Planta · doi:10.1007/bf00384868 · Cited by 101
Cited by
Photoreceptor Signaling Networks in Plant Responses to Shade
Casal, J. J. (2013) · Annual Review of Plant Biology · doi:10.1146/annurev-arplant-050312-120221 · Cited by 865
Self-citationCasal, J. J. (2012) · The Arabidopsis Book · doi:10.1199/tab.0157 · Cited by 382
Self-citationLight spectral quality, phytochrome and plant competition
Schmitt, J., & Wulff, R. D. (1993) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/0169-5347(93)90157-k · Cited by 366
Schmitt, J., McCormac, A. C., & Smith, H. (1995) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/285832 · Cited by 318
Self-citationPLASTICITY TO LIGHT CUES AND RESOURCES IN ARABIDOPSIS THALIANA: TESTING FOR ADAPTIVE VALUE AND COSTS
Dorn, L. A., Pyle, E. H., & Schmitt, J. (2000) · Evolution · doi:10.1111/j.0014-3820.2000.tb01242.x · Cited by 271
Metadata
- Authors
- CASAL, J. J., & SMITH, H.
- Venue
- Plant, Cell & Environment
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1989-12
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 855-862
- ISSN
- 0140-7791 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-3040
- OpenAlex
- W2128783290
- Cited by
- 212
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 10.87
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The function, action and adaptive significance of phytochrome in light‐grown plants. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-3040.1989.tb01966.x
- The paper
- CASAL, J. J., & SMITH, H. (1989). The function, action and adaptive significance of phytochrome in light‐grown plants. Plant, Cell & Environment. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3040.1989.tb01966.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.