The DOI matches its Crossref record; 32 of the 32 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Modelling photosynthesis of cotton grown in elevated CO2
Abstract
Cotton plants were grown in CO 2‐controlled growth chambers in atmospheres of either 35 or 65 Pa CO 2. A widely accepted model of C 3 leaf photosynthesis was parameterized for leaves from both CO 2 treatments using non‐linear least squares regression techniques, but in order to achieve reasonable fits, it was necessary to include a phosphate limitation resulting from inadequate triose phosphate utilization. Despite the accumulation of large amounts of starch (>50 g m−2) in the high CO 2 plants, the photosynthetic characteristics of leaves in both treatments were similar, although the maximum rate of Rubisco activity (Vc max), estimated from A versus C i response curves measured at 29°C, was ∼10% lower in leaves from plants grown in high CO 2. The relationship between key model parameters and total leaf N was linear, the only difference between CO 2 treatments being a slight reduction in the slope of the line relating Vc max to leaf N in plants grown at high CO 2. Stomatal conductance of leaves of plants grown and measured at 65 Pa CO 2 was approximately 32% lower than that of plants grown and measured at 35 Pa. Because photosynthetic capacity of leaves grown in high CO 2 was only slightly less than that of leaves grown in 35 Pa CO 2, net photosynthesis measured at the growth CO 2, light and temperature conditions was approximately 25% greater in leaves of plants grown in high CO 2, despite the reduction in leaf conductance. Greater assimilation rate was one factor allowing plants grown in high CO 2 to incorporate 30% more biomass during the first 36 d of growth.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A biochemical model of photosynthetic CO2 assimilation in leaves of C3 species
Farquhar, G. D., von Caemmerer, S., & Berry, J. A. (1980) · Planta · doi:10.1007/bf00386231 · Cited by 8,796
Some relationships between the biochemistry of photosynthesis and the gas exchange of leaves
von Caemmerer, S., & Farquhar, G. D. (1981) · Planta · doi:10.1007/bf00384257 · Cited by 4,696
Photosynthesis and nitrogen relationships in leaves of C3 plants
Evans, J. R. (1989) · Oecologia · doi:10.1007/bf00377192 · Cited by 3,400
Ball, J. T., Woodrow, I. E., & Berry, J. A. (1987) · Progress in Photosynthesis Research · doi:10.1007/978-94-017-0519-6_48 · Cited by 2,496
On the Economy of Plant Form and Function.
Mankiewicz, P. S., & Givnish, T. J. (1988) · Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club · doi:10.2307/2996167 · Cited by 1,091
Brooks, A., & Farquhar, G. D. (1985) · Planta · doi:10.1007/bf00392238 · Cited by 1,018
Crop responses to carbon dioxide doubling: a literature survey
Cure, J. D., & Acock, B. (1986) · Agricultural and Forest Meteorology · doi:10.1016/0168-1923(86)90054-7 · Cited by 915
Photosynthesis in intact leaves of C3 plants: Physics, physiology and rate limitations
Sharkey, T. D. (1985) · The Botanical Review · doi:10.1007/bf02861058 · Cited by 897
Field, C. (1983) · Oecologia · doi:10.1007/bf00379710 · Cited by 870
Ehleringer, J., & Björkman, O. (1977) · Plant Physiology · doi:10.1104/pp.59.1.86 · Cited by 790
Cited by
Fitting photosynthetic carbon dioxide response curves for C3 leaves
SHARKEY, T. D., BERNACCHI, C. J., FARQUHAR, G. D., & SINGSAAS, E. L. (2007) · Plant, Cell & Environment · doi:10.1111/j.1365-3040.2007.01710.x · Cited by 1,317
Evans, J. R., & Poorter, H. (2001) · Plant, Cell & Environment · doi:10.1046/j.1365-3040.2001.00724.x · Cited by 1,229
ETHIER, G. J., & LIVINGSTON, N. J. (2004) · Plant, Cell & Environment · doi:10.1111/j.1365-3040.2004.01140.x · Cited by 587
Atkin, O. K., Bruhn, D., Hurry, V. M., & Tjoelker, M. G. (2005) · Functional Plant Biology · doi:10.1071/fp03176 · Cited by 490
The effect of atmospheric CO2 concentration on carbon isotope fractionation in C3 land plants
Schubert, B. A., & Jahren, A. H. (2012) · Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta · doi:10.1016/j.gca.2012.08.003 · Cited by 334
Metadata
- Authors
- HARLEY, P. C., THOMAS, R. B., REYNOLDS, J. F., & STRAIN, B. R.
- Venue
- Plant, Cell & Environment
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1992-04
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 271-282
- ISSN
- 0140-7791 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-3040
- OpenAlex
- W2159177329
- Cited by
- 774
- References
- 32
- FWCI
- 25.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Modelling photosynthesis of cotton grown in elevated CO2. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-3040.1992.tb00974.x
- The paper
- HARLEY, P. C., THOMAS, R. B., REYNOLDS, J. F., & STRAIN, B. R. (1992). Modelling photosynthesis of cotton grown in elevated CO2. Plant, Cell & Environment. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3040.1992.tb00974.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.