Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 774

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 32 of the 32 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Modelling photosynthesis of cotton grown in elevated CO2

HARLEY, P. C., THOMAS, R. B., REYNOLDS, J. F., STRAIN, B. R.·1992·Plant, Cell & Environment

Abstract

Cotton plants were grown in CO 2‐controlled growth chambers in atmospheres of either 35 or 65 Pa CO 2. A widely accepted model of C 3 leaf photosynthesis was parameterized for leaves from both CO 2 treatments using non‐linear least squares regression techniques, but in order to achieve reasonable fits, it was necessary to include a phosphate limitation resulting from inadequate triose phosphate utilization. Despite the accumulation of large amounts of starch (>50 g m−2) in the high CO 2 plants, the photosynthetic characteristics of leaves in both treatments were similar, although the maximum rate of Rubisco activity (Vc max), estimated from A versus C i response curves measured at 29°C, was ∼10% lower in leaves from plants grown in high CO 2. The relationship between key model parameters and total leaf N was linear, the only difference between CO 2 treatments being a slight reduction in the slope of the line relating Vc max to leaf N in plants grown at high CO 2. Stomatal conductance of leaves of plants grown and measured at 65 Pa CO 2 was approximately 32% lower than that of plants grown and measured at 35 Pa. Because photosynthetic capacity of leaves grown in high CO 2 was only slightly less than that of leaves grown in 35 Pa CO 2, net photosynthesis measured at the growth CO 2, light and temperature conditions was approximately 25% greater in leaves of plants grown in high CO 2, despite the reduction in leaf conductance. Greater assimilation rate was one factor allowing plants grown in high CO 2 to incorporate 30% more biomass during the first 36 d of growth.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-3040.1992.tb00974.x

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 32 references

Cited by

See all 774

Metadata

Authors
HARLEY, P. C., THOMAS, R. B., REYNOLDS, J. F., & STRAIN, B. R.
Venue
Plant, Cell & Environment
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1992-04
Volume
15
Issue
3
Pages
271-282
ISSN
  • 0140-7791 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-3040
OpenAlex
W2159177329
Cited by
774
References
32
FWCI
25.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Modelling photosynthesis of cotton grown in elevated CO2. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-3040.1992.tb00974.x
The paper
HARLEY, P. C., THOMAS, R. B., REYNOLDS, J. F., & STRAIN, B. R. (1992). Modelling photosynthesis of cotton grown in elevated CO2. Plant, Cell & Environment. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3040.1992.tb00974.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.