Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 587

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 83 of the 83 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

On the need to incorporate sensitivity to CO2 transfer conductance into the Farquhar–von Caemmerer–Berry leaf photosynthesis model

ETHIER, G. J., LIVINGSTON, N. J.·2004·Plant, Cell & Environment

Abstract

Virtually all current estimates of the maximum carboxylation rate (Vcmax) of ribulose‐1,5‐bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase (Rubisco) and the maximum electron transport rate (Jmax) for C 3 species implicitly assume an infinite CO 2 transfer conductance (gi). And yet, most measurements in perennial plant species or in ageing or stressed leaves show that gi imposes a significant limitation on photosynthesis. Herein, we demonstrate that many current parameterizations of the photosynthesis model of Farquhar, von Caemmerer & Berry (Planta 149, 78–90, 1980) based on the leaf intercellular CO 2 concentration (Ci) are incorrect for leaves where gi limits photosynthesis. We show how conventional A–Ci curve (net CO 2 assimilation rate of a leaf –An– as a function of Ci) fitting methods which rely on a rectangular hyperbola model under the assumption of infinite gi can significantly underestimate Vcmax for such leaves. Alternative parameterizations of the conventional method based on a single, apparent Michaelis–Menten constant for CO 2 evaluated at Ci[Km(CO 2)i] used for all C 3 plants are also not acceptable since the relationship between Vcmax and gi is not conserved among species. We present an alternative A–Ci curve fitting method that accounts for gi through a non‐rectangular hyperbola version of the model of Farquhar et al. (1980). Simulated and real examples are used to demonstrate how this new approach eliminates the errors of the conventional A–Ci curve fitting method and provides Vcmax estimates that are virtually insensitive to gi. Finally, we show how the new A–Ci curve fitting method can be used to estimate the value of the kinetic constants of Rubisco in vivo is presented

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2004.01140.x

Cites

83 of 83 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 83 references

Cited by

See all 587

Metadata

Authors
ETHIER, G. J., & LIVINGSTON, N. J.
Venue
Plant, Cell & Environment
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2004-02
Volume
27
Issue
2
Pages
137-153
ISSN
  • 0140-7791 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-3040
OpenAlex
W2151969797
Cited by
587
References
83
FWCI
6.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: On the need to incorporate sensitivity to CO2 transfer conductance into the Farquhar–von Caemmerer–Berry leaf photosynthesis model. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-3040.2004.01140.x
The paper
ETHIER, G. J., & LIVINGSTON, N. J. (2004). On the need to incorporate sensitivity to CO2 transfer conductance into the Farquhar–von Caemmerer–Berry leaf photosynthesis model. Plant, Cell & Environment. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3040.2004.01140.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.