Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 579

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 83 of the 83 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The use of natural abundance of nitrogen isotopes in plant physiology and ecology

HANDLEY, L. L., RAVEN, J. A.·1992·Plant, Cell & Environment

Abstract

Nitrogen stable isotope (15 N, 14 N) natural abundance has been much less used than carbon isotopes (13 C, 12 C) in plant physiology and ecology. Analytical problems, the lower fractional abundance of 15 N than of 13 C in the biosphere, the greater complexity of the N cycle relative to the C cycle, and smaller expressed discriminations in nature, are contributing factors. The major N pools, globally, have different isotope signatures: atmospheric N 2 is 15 N‐depleted relative to organic N (including sedimentary N), a situation resulting from a greater expressed discrimination in the organic N to N 2 (via denitrification) reaction than of diazotrophy during accumulation of the reduced N. Essentially all of the enzymes except nitrogenase which transform N compounds show discrimination against 15 N, although for glutamine synthetase, and the amination of 2‐oxoglutarate and pyruvate, this is only seen in terms of NH 4+ rather than the true substrate, NH 3. Discrimination is expressed in various N interconversions within plants, leading to substantial differences in δ 15 N (up to 12‰) among N compounds and macroscopic plant parts. N isotope fractionation during assimilation of exogenous combined N is often much lower than that expected from studies of isolated enzymes due to processes which show very little discrimination, such as limitation by transport through aqueous solution and membranes. Application of 15 N/14 N discrimination studies to plant ecology have concentrated largely on distinguishing diazotrophy from N supplied from combined N, based on the lower 15 N/14 N in diazotrophs due to the higher 15 N/14 N of combined N sources not being offset by fractionation during uptake. While potentially very useful, a number of pitfalls are discussed in its ecological use in both terrestrial and aquatic systems. N isotope discrimination is also useful in tracking N through food webs, and hence, back to combined N sources for plants.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-3040.1992.tb01650.x

Cites

83 of 83 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 83 references

Metadata

Authors
HANDLEY, L. L., & RAVEN, J. A.
Venue
Plant, Cell & Environment
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1992-12
Volume
15
Issue
9
Pages
965-985
ISSN
  • 0140-7791 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-3040
OpenAlex
W2145960035
Cited by
579
References
83
FWCI
15.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The use of natural abundance of nitrogen isotopes in plant physiology and ecology. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-3040.1992.tb01650.x
The paper
HANDLEY, L. L., & RAVEN, J. A. (1992). The use of natural abundance of nitrogen isotopes in plant physiology and ecology. Plant, Cell & Environment. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3040.1992.tb01650.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.