The DOI matches its Crossref record; 47 of the 47 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A meta‐analysis of leaf gas exchange and nitrogen in trees grown under elevated carbon dioxide
Abstract
The response of trees to rising atmospheric CO 2 concentration ([CO 2]) is of concern to forest ecologists and global carbon modellers and is the focus of an increasing body of research work. I review studies published up to May 1994, and several unpublished works, which reported at least one of the following: net CO 2 assimilation (A), stomatal conductance (gs), leaf dark respiration (Rd) leaf nitrogen or specific leaf area (SLA) in woody plants grown at <400 μmol mol−1 CO 2 or at 600–800 μmol mol−1 CO 2. The resulting data from 41 species were categorized according to growth conditions (unstressed versus stressed), length of CO 2 exposure, pot size and exposure facility [growth chamber (GC), greenhouse (GH), or open‐top chamber (OTC)] and interpreted using meta‐analytic methods. Overall, A showed a large and significant increase at elevated [CO 2] but length of CO 2 exposure and the exposure facility were important modifiers of this response. Plants exposed for < 50 d had a significantly greater response, and those from GCs had a significantly lower response than plants from longer exposures or from OTC studies. Negative acclimation of A was significant and general among stressed plants, but in unstressed plants was influenced by length of CO 2 exposure, the exposure facility and/or pot size. Growth at elevated [CO 2] resulted in moderate reductions in gs in unstressed plants, but there was no significant effect of CO 2 on gs in stressed plants. Leaf dark respiration (mass or area basis) was reduced strongly by growth at high [CO 2] > while leaf N was reduced only when expressed on a mass basis. This review is the first meta‐analysis of elevated CO 2 studies and provides statistical confirmation of several general responses of trees to elevated [CO 2]. It also highlights important areas of continued uncertainty in our understanding of these responses.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Statistical Methods for Meta-Analysis.
Freeman, P. R., Hedges, L. V., & Olkin, I. (1986) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2531069 · Cited by 4,784
Terrestrial ecosystems and the carbon cycle
SCHIMEL, D. S. (1995) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2486.1995.tb00008.x · Cited by 1,564
Rising CO2 levels and their potential significance for carbon flow in photosynthetic cells
STITT, M. (1991) · Plant, Cell & Environment · doi:10.1111/j.1365-3040.1991.tb01440.x · Cited by 975
The Handbook of Research Synthesis
Ziegel, E. R., Cooper, H., & Hedges, L. (1995) · Technometrics · doi:10.2307/1269651 · Cited by 927
Life of the mind: The interface of psychopharmaceuticals, domestic economies, and social abandonment
Biehl, J. (2004) · American Ethnologist · doi:10.1525/ae.2004.31.4.475 · Cited by 903
A Meta-Analysis of Competition in Field Experiments
Gurevitch, J., Morrow, L. L., Wallace, A., & Walsh, J. S. (1992) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/285428 · Cited by 865
Effects of source‐sink relations on photosynthetic acclimation to elevated CO2
ARP, W. J. (1991) · Plant, Cell & Environment · doi:10.1111/j.1365-3040.1991.tb01450.x · Cited by 800
Interspecific variation in the growth response of plants to an elevated ambient CO2 concentration
Poorter, H. (1993) · CO2 and biosphere · doi:10.1007/978-94-011-1797-5_6 · Cited by 777
Tansley Review No. 71 Effects of elevated atmospheric CO2on woody plants
CEULEMANS, R., & MOUSSEAU, M. (1994) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.1994.tb03961.x · Cited by 707
Interspecific variation in the growth response of plants to an elevated ambient CO2 concentration
Poorter, H. (1993) · Vegetatio · doi:10.1007/bf00048146 · Cited by 669
Cited by
Soil carbon stocks and land use change: a meta analysis
Guo, L. B., & Gifford, R. M. (2002) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1046/j.1354-1013.2002.00486.x · Cited by 3,972
Ainsworth, E. A., & Long, S. P. (2005) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.2004.01224.x · Cited by 3,624
MORE EFFICIENT PLANTS: A Consequence of Rising Atmospheric CO2?
Drake, B. G., Gonzàlez-Meler, M. A., & Long, S. P. (1997) · Annual Review of Plant Physiology and Plant Molecular Biology · doi:10.1146/annurev.arplant.48.1.609 · Cited by 1,925
RISING ATMOSPHERIC CARBON DIOXIDE: Plants FACE the Future
Long, S. P., Ainsworth, E. A., Rogers, A., & Ort, D. R. (2004) · Annual Review of Plant Biology · doi:10.1146/annurev.arplant.55.031903.141610 · Cited by 1,715
Effects of forest management on soil C and N storage: meta analysis
Johnson, D. W., & Curtis, P. S. (2001) · Forest Ecology and Management · doi:10.1016/s0378-1127(00)00282-6 · Cited by 1,353
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- CURTIS, P. S.
- Venue
- Plant, Cell & Environment
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1996-02
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 127-137
- ISSN
- 0140-7791 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-3040
- OpenAlex
- W2117112707
- Cited by
- 451
- References
- 47
- FWCI
- 40.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A meta‐analysis of leaf gas exchange and nitrogen in trees grown under elevated carbon dioxide. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-3040.1996.tb00234.x
- The paper
- CURTIS, P. S. (1996). A meta‐analysis of leaf gas exchange and nitrogen in trees grown under elevated carbon dioxide. Plant, Cell & Environment. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3040.1996.tb00234.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.