The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Microarray analysis of salicylic acid‐ and jasmonic acid‐signalling in responses of Nicotiana attenuata to attack by insects from multiple feeding guilds
Open accessAbstract
Resistance to herbivore attack is elicited by damage‐ and herbivore‐specific signals. To understand the role of salicylic acid (SA) and jasmonic acid (JA) signalling in the herbivore‐induced transcriptional responses of the native tobacco Nicotiana attenuata, a comparison was made of the responses in undamaged systemic leaves after attack by five herbivore species (Manduca sexta, Spodoptera littoralis, Trichoplusia ni, Tupiocoris notatus and Myzus nicotianae) from three feeding guilds and to elicitation by SA, BTH and methyl‐JA with a 789‐gene oligo‐microarray and measured endogenous SA and JA levels. Systemic responses to M. sexta attack were similar to the responses in locally attacked tissues; however, the up‐regulation of genes (such as proteinase inhibitor, PI) was more attenuated and resembled the responses to attack from the other Lepidopteran, S. littoralis, and to methyl‐JA elicitation. Responses to attack from the puncture‐feeding T. notatus repressed some JA‐elicited genes (PI) elicited by the leaf‐chewing Lepidopterans and most closely resembled SA elicitation. Attack from the phloem‐feeding M. nicotianae aphids elicited few responses. Treatment with the SA‐mimic BTH induced both SA‐ and JA‐elicited genes and most closely resembled the aphid response. SA concentrations were uniformly increased by herbivore attack and correlated with the down‐regulation of photosynthetic genes in all treatments.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Induced Resistance for Plant Disease Control: Maximizing the Efficacy of Resistance Elicitors
Walters, D., Walsh, D., Newton, A., & Lyon, G. (2005) · Phytopathology® · doi:10.1094/phyto-95-1368 · Cited by 448
Hemipterans as Plant Pathogens
Kaloshian, I., & Walling, L. L. (2005) · Annual Review of Phytopathology · doi:10.1146/annurev.phyto.43.040204.135944 · Cited by 264
Using ‘mute’ plants to translate volatile signals
Paschold, A., Halitschke, R., & Baldwin, I. T. (2006) · The Plant Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1365-313x.2005.02623.x · Cited by 151
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- HEIDEL, A. J., & BALDWIN, I. T.
- Venue
- Plant, Cell & Environment
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2004-10-20
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 1362-1373
- ISSN
- 0140-7791 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-3040
- OpenAlex
- W2143089794
- Cited by
- 214
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 19.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Microarray analysis of salicylic acid‐ and jasmonic acid‐signalling in responses of Nicotiana attenuata to attack by insects from multiple feeding guilds. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-3040.2004.01228.x
- The paper
- HEIDEL, A. J., & BALDWIN, I. T. (2004). Microarray analysis of salicylic acid‐ and jasmonic acid‐signalling in responses of Nicotiana attenuata to attack by insects from multiple feeding guilds. Plant, Cell & Environment. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3040.2004.01228.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.