The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Assessing the future global impacts of ozone on vegetation
Open accessAbstract
Ozone is a major secondary air pollutant, the current concentrations of which have been shown to have significant adverse effects on crop yields, forest growth and species composition. In North America and Europe, emissions of ozone precursors are decreasing but in other regions of the world, especially Asia, where much less is known about its impacts, they are increasing rapidly. There is also evidence of an increase in global background ozone concentrations, which will lead to significant changes in global ozone exposure over this century, during which direct and indirect effects of other changes in the global atmosphere will also modify plant responses to ozone. This paper considers how far our current understanding of the mechanisms of ozone impacts, and the tools currently used for ozone risk assessment, are capable of evaluating the consequences of these changing global patterns of exposure to ozone. Risk assessment based on relationships between external concentration and plant response is inadequate for these new challenges. New models linking stomatal flux, and detoxification and repair processes, to carbon assimilation and allocation provide a more mechanistic basis for future risk assessments. However, there are a range of more complex secondary effects of ozone that are not considered in current risk assessment, and there is an urgent need to develop more holistic approaches linking the effects of ozone, climate, and nutrient and water availability, on individual plants, species interactions and ecosystem function.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Bale, J. S., Masters, G. J., Hodkinson, I. D., Awmack, C., Bezemer, T. M., Brown, V. K., Butterfield, J., Buse, A., Coulson, J. C., Farrar, J., et al. (2002) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2486.2002.00451.x · Cited by 2,775
Cited by
Climate Impacts on Agriculture: Implications for Crop Production
Hatfield, J. L., Boote, K. J., Kimball, B. A., Ziska, L. H., Izaurralde, R. C., Ort, D., Thomson, A. M., & Wolfe, D. (2011) · Agronomy Journal · doi:10.2134/agronj2010.0303 · Cited by 1,645
Salicylic acid-induced abiotic stress tolerance and underlying mechanisms in plants
Khan, M. I. R., Fatma, M., Per, T. S., Anjum, N. A., & Khan, N. A. (2015) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2015.00462 · Cited by 1,258
Indirect radiative forcing of climate change through ozone effects on the land-carbon sink
Sitch, S., Cox, P. M., Collins, W. J., & Huntingford, C. (2007) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature06059 · Cited by 1,019
Anenberg, S. C., Schwartz, J., Shindell, D., Amann, M., Faluvegi, G., Klimont, Z., Janssens-Maenhout, G., Pozzoli, L., Van Dingenen, R., Vignati, E., et al. (2012) · Environmental Health Perspectives · doi:10.1289/ehp.1104301 · Cited by 442
Feng, Z., & Kobayashi, K. (2009) · Atmospheric Environment · doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2008.11.033 · Cited by 344
Metadata
- Authors
- ASHMORE, M. R.
- Venue
- Plant, Cell & Environment
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2005-03-31
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 949-964
- ISSN
- 0140-7791 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-3040
- OpenAlex
- W2115035590
- Cited by
- 919
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 46.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Assessing the future global impacts of ozone on vegetation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-3040.2005.01341.x
- The paper
- ASHMORE, M. R. (2005). Assessing the future global impacts of ozone on vegetation. Plant, Cell & Environment. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3040.2005.01341.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.