The DOI matches its Crossref record; 13 of the 13 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Interaction of heavy metals with the sulphur metabolism in angiosperms from an ecological point of view
Abstract
The metabolism of sulphur in angiosperms is reviewed under the aspect of exposure to ecologically relevant concentrations of sulphur, heavy metals and metalloids. Because of the inconsistent use of the term ‘metal tolerance’, in this review the degree of tolerance to arsenic and heavy metals is divided into three categories: hypotolerance, basal tolerance and hypertolerance. The composition of nutrient solutions applied to physiological experiments let see that the well‐known interactions of calcium, sulphate and zinc supply with uptake of heavy metals, especially cadmium are insufficiently considered. Expression of genes involved in reductive sulphate assimilation pathway and enzyme activities are stimulated by cadmium and partially by copper, but nearly not by other heavy metals. The synthesis of the sulphur‐rich compounds glucosinolates, metallothioneins and phytochelatins is affected in a metal‐specific way. Phytochelatin levels are low in all metal(loid)‐hypertolerant plant species growing in the natural environment on metal(loid)‐enriched soils. If laboratory experiments mimic the natural environments, especially high Zn/Cd ratios and good sulphur supply, and chemical analyses are extended to more mineral elements than the single metal(loid) under investigation, a better understanding of the impact of metal(loid)s on the sulphur metabolism can be achieved.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Molecular mechanisms of plant metal tolerance and homeostasis
Clemens, S. (2001) · Planta · doi:10.1007/s004250000458 · Cited by 1,417
Phytoremediation of soil metals
Chaney, R. L., Malik, M., Li, Y. M., Brown, S. L., Brewer, E. P., Angle, J. S., & Baker, A. J. (1997) · Current Opinion in Biotechnology · doi:10.1016/s0958-1669(97)80004-3 · Cited by 1,254
The molecular physiology of heavy metal transport in the Zn/Cd hyperaccumulator Thlaspi caerulescens
Pence, N. S., Larsen, P. B., Ebbs, S. D., Letham, D. L. D., Lasat, M. M., Garvin, D. F., Eide, D., & Kochian, L. V. (2000) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.97.9.4956 · Cited by 748
Arsenic in the environment: Biology and Chemistry
Bhattacharya, P., Welch, A. H., Stollenwerk, K. G., McLaughlin, M. J., Bundschuh, J., & Panaullah, G. (2007) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2007.02.037 · Cited by 625
Weber, M., Harada, E., Vess, C., Roepenack‐Lahaye, E. V., & Clemens, S. (2004) · The Plant Journal · doi:10.1046/j.1365-313x.2003.01960.x · Cited by 440
Zhao, F., Hamon, R. E., Lombi, E., McLaughlin, M. J., & McGrath, S. P. (2002) · Journal of Experimental Botany · doi:10.1093/jexbot/53.368.535 · Cited by 385 · cited 1×
“derived from a calcium-enriched metal soil there is no effect; in plants growing naturally in a calcium-poor environment, experimental addition of Ca diminishes the Cd uptake (Zhao et al. 2002; Cosio et al. 2004).”
BackgroundA novel CPx‐ATPase from the cadmium hyperaccumulator Thlaspi caerulescens
Bernard, C., Roosens, N., Czernic, P., Lebrun, M., & Verbruggen, N. (2004) · FEBS Letters · doi:10.1016/j.febslet.2004.05.036 · Cited by 248
BERT, V., MACNAIR, M. R., DE LAGUERIE, P., SAUMITOU‐LAPRADE, P., & PETIT, D. (2000) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1046/j.1469-8137.2000.00634.x · Cited by 225 · cited 1×
“The term basal metal(loid) tolerant is identical with ‘basic metal tolerant’ (Arrivault, Senger & Krämer 2006), ‘normal constitutively metal tolerant’ (Bert et al. 2000), ‘metal tolerant’ (Pomponi et al.”
BackgroundA comparison of the Thlaspi caerulescens and Thlaspi arvense shoot transcriptomes
Hammond, J. P., Bowen, H. C., White, P. J., Mills, V., Pyke, K. A., Baker, A. J. M., Whiting, S. N., May, S. T., & Broadley, M. R. (2006) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.2006.01662.x · Cited by 223
Ebbs, S., Ahner, B., Kochian, L., & Lau, I. (2002) · Planta · doi:10.1007/s004250100650 · Cited by 214
Cited by
Unravelling cadmium toxicity and tolerance in plants: Insight into regulatory mechanisms
Gallego, S. M., Pena, L. B., Barcia, R. A., Azpilicueta, C. E., Iannone, M. F., Rosales, E. P., Zawoznik, M. S., Groppa, M. D., & Benavides, M. P. (2012) · Environmental and Experimental Botany · doi:10.1016/j.envexpbot.2012.04.006 · Cited by 1,199
Root responses to cadmium in the rhizosphere: a review
Lux, A., Martinka, M., Vaculik, M., & White, P. J. (2011) · Journal of Experimental Botany · doi:10.1093/jxb/erq281 · Cited by 1,100
Krzesłowska, M. (2011) · Acta Physiologiae Plantarum · doi:10.1007/s11738-010-0581-z · Cited by 709
Regulatory networks of cadmium stress in plants
DalCorso, G., Farinati, S., & Furini, A. (2010) · Plant Signaling & Behavior · doi:10.4161/psb.5.6.11425 · Cited by 469
Cadmium stress tolerance in crop plants: Probing the role of sulfur
Gill, S. S., & Tuteja, N. (2011) · Plant Signaling & Behavior · doi:10.4161/psb.6.2.14880 · Cited by 379
Metadata
- Authors
- ERNST, W. H. O., KRAUSS, G., VERKLEIJ, J. A. C., & WESENBERG, D.
- Venue
- Plant, Cell & Environment
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2007-10-18
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 123-143
- ISSN
- 0140-7791 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-3040
- OpenAlex
- W2079208450
- Cited by
- 225
- References
- 13
- FWCI
- 3.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Interaction of heavy metals with the sulphur metabolism in angiosperms from an ecological point of view. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-3040.2007.01746.x
- The paper
- ERNST, W. H. O., KRAUSS, G., VERKLEIJ, J. A. C., & WESENBERG, D. (2008). Interaction of heavy metals with the sulphur metabolism in angiosperms from an ecological point of view. Plant, Cell & Environment. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3040.2007.01746.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
