The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Leaf stomatal responses to vapour pressure deficit under current and CO2‐enriched atmosphere explained by the economics of gas exchange
Abstract
Using the economics of gas exchange, early studies derived an expression of stomatal conductance (g) assuming that water cost per unit carbon is constant as the daily loss of water in transpiration (fe) is minimized for a given gain in photosynthesis (fc). Other studies reached identical results, yet assumed different forms for the underlying functions and defined the daily cost parameter as carbon cost per unit water. We demonstrated that the solution can be recovered when optimization is formulated at time scales commensurate with the response time of g to environmental stimuli. The optimization theory produced three emergent gas exchange responses that are consistent with observed behaviour: (1) the sensitivity of g to vapour pressure deficit (D) is similar to that obtained from a previous synthesis of more than 40 species showing g to scale as 1 − m log(D), where m ? [0.5,0.6], (2) the theory is consistent with the onset of an apparent ‘feed‐forward’ mechanism in g, and (3) the emergent non‐linear relationship between the ratio of intercellular to atmospheric [CO 2] (ci/ca) and D agrees with the results available on this response. We extended the theory to diagnosing experimental results on the sensitivity of g to D under varying ca.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A biochemical model of photosynthetic CO2 assimilation in leaves of C3 species
Farquhar, G. D., von Caemmerer, S., & Berry, J. A. (1980) · Planta · doi:10.1007/bf00386231 · Cited by 8,796
Cited by
Katul, G., Manzoni, S., Palmroth, S., & Oren, R. (2010) · Annals of Botany · doi:10.1093/aob/mcp292 · Cited by 377
Self-citationThe Evolution of Mechanisms Driving the Stomatal Response to Vapor Pressure Deficit
McAdam, S. A. M., & Brodribb, T. J. (2015) · Plant Physiology · doi:10.1104/pp.114.252940 · Cited by 310
Sulman, B. N., Roman, D. T., Yi, K., Wang, L., Phillips, R. P., & Novick, K. A. (2016) · Geophysical Research Letters · doi:10.1002/2016gl069416 · Cited by 309
Environmental changes during secondary succession in a tropical dry forest in Mexico
Lebrija-Trejos, E., Pérez-García, E. A., Meave, J. A., Poorter, L., & Bongers, F. (2011) · Journal of Tropical Ecology · doi:10.1017/s0266467411000253 · Cited by 264
Metadata
- Authors
- KATUL, G. G., PALMROTH, S., & OREN, R.
- Venue
- Plant, Cell & Environment
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2009-07-09
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 968-979
- ISSN
- 0140-7791 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-3040
- OpenAlex
- W2028833815
- Cited by
- 308
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 10.55
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Leaf stomatal responses to vapour pressure deficit under current and CO2‐enriched atmosphere explained by the economics of gas exchange. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-3040.2009.01977.x
- The paper
- KATUL, G. G., PALMROTH, S., & OREN, R. (2009). Leaf stomatal responses to vapour pressure deficit under current and CO2‐enriched atmosphere explained by the economics of gas exchange. Plant, Cell & Environment. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3040.2009.01977.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.