The DOI matches its Crossref record; 173 of the 173 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Picking battles wisely: plant behaviour under competition
Open accessAbstract
Plants are limited in their ability to choose their neighbours, but they are able to orchestrate a wide spectrum of rational competitive behaviours that increase their prospects to prevail under various ecological settings. Through the perception of neighbours, plants are able to anticipate probable competitive interactions and modify their competitive behaviours to maximize their long‐term gains. Specifically, plants can minimize competitive encounters by avoiding their neighbours; maximize their competitive effects by aggressively confronting their neighbours; or tolerate the competitive effects of their neighbours. However, the adaptive values of these non‐mutually exclusive options are expected to depend strongly on the plants' evolutionary background and to change dynamically according to their past development, and relative sizes and vigour. Additionally, the magnitude of competitive responsiveness is expected to be positively correlated with the reliability of the environmental information regarding the expected competitive interactions and the expected time left for further plastic modifications. Concurrent competition over external and internal resources and morphogenetic signals may enable some plants to increase their efficiency and external competitive performance by discriminately allocating limited resources to their more promising organs at the expense of failing or less successful organs.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The genetical theory of natural selection
Fisher, R. A. (1930) · doi:10.5962/bhl.title.27468 · Cited by 17,617
The Theory of Island Biogeography
MacArthur, R. H., & Wilson, E. O. (2001) · Princeton University Press eBooks · doi:10.1515/9781400881376 · Cited by 12,632
The Evolution of Life-histories
Benton, T. G., & Stearne, S. C. (1993) · The Journal of Animal Ecology · doi:10.2307/5403 · Cited by 12,228
The Theory of Island Biogeography
Kirkby, M. J., MacArthur, R. H., & Wilson, E. O. (1968) · The Geographical Journal · doi:10.2307/1796430 · Cited by 11,581
Evolution and the Theory of Games
Smith, J. M. (1988) · Did Darwin Get It Right? · doi:10.1007/978-1-4684-7862-4_22 · Cited by 7,906
Evolution and the Theory of Games
Smith, J. M. (1982) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511806292 · Cited by 6,922
Developmental Plasticity and Evolution
West-Eberhard, M. J. (2003) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780195122343.001.0001 · Cited by 6,115
Darwin, C., Murray, J., Sons, W. C. A., & Evans., B. &. (1859) · doi:10.5962/bhl.title.82303 · Cited by 5,608
Optimal foraging, the marginal value theorem
Charnov, E. L. (1976) · Theoretical Population Biology · doi:10.1016/0040-5809(76)90040-x · Cited by 5,374
Plant Strategies and Vegetation Processes
Grime, J. P. (1979) · Andalas University Repository (Andalas University) · Cited by 5,371
Cited by
Freschet, G. T., Pagès, L., Iversen, C. M., Comas, L. H., Rewald, B., Roumet, C., Klimešová, J., Zadworny, M., Poorter, H., Postma, J. A., et al. (2021) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/nph.17572 · Cited by 668
McNickle, G. G., & Brown, J. S. (2014) · Journal of Ecology · doi:10.1111/1365-2745.12259 · Cited by 60
Metadata
- Authors
- NOVOPLANSKY, A.
- Venue
- Plant, Cell & Environment
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2009-05-07
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 726-741
- ISSN
- 0140-7791 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-3040
- OpenAlex
- W1991716684
- Cited by
- 298
- References
- 173
- FWCI
- 15.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Picking battles wisely: plant behaviour under competition. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-3040.2009.01979.x
- The paper
- NOVOPLANSKY, A. (2009). Picking battles wisely: plant behaviour under competition. Plant, Cell & Environment. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3040.2009.01979.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.