Cited by 111Plant Stress Responses and TolerancePlant-Microbe Interactions and ImmunityInsect-Plant Interactions and Control

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Allyl isothiocyanate (AITC) induces stomatal closure in Arabidopsis

Open access

Abstract

Isothiocyanates (ITCs) are degradation products of glucosinolates in crucifer plants and have repellent effect on insects, pathogens and herbivores. In this study, we report that exogenously applied allyl isothiocyanate (AITC) induced stomatal closure in Arabidopsis via production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and nitric oxide (NO), and elevation of cytosolic Ca 2+. AITC‐induced stomatal closures were partially inhibited by an inhibitor of NADPH oxidase and completely inhibited by glutathione monoethyl ester (GSHmee). AITC‐induced stomatal closure and ROS production were examined in abscisic acid (ABA) deficient mutant aba2‐2 and methyl jasmonate (MeJA)‐deficient mutant aos to elucidate involvement of endogenous ABA and MeJA. Genetic evidences have demonstrated that AITC‐induced stomatal closure required MeJA priming but not ABA priming. These results raise the possibility that crucifer plants produce ITCs to induce stomatal closure, leading to suppression of water loss and invasion of fungi through stomata.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2011.02385.x

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Aliphatic glucosinolates are involved in stomatal regulation.

    “Together with the finding that glucosinolate biosynthesis and activation mutants are less tolerant to drought (Salehin et al., 2019), and that glucosinolate breakdown products can trigger stomatal closure in Arabidopsis and Vicia faba (Khokon et al., 2011;Hossain et al., 2013), these results provide evidence that aliphatic glucosinolates are involved in stomatal regulation.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 37

  1. 10.1271/bbb.100513 · DOI
  2. 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2005.02615.x · DOI
  3. 10.1073/pnas.252461999 · DOI
  4. 10.2307/3869877 · DOI
  5. 10.1073/pnas.0912030107 · DOI
  6. 10.1016/j.jplph.2009.11.006 · DOI
  7. 10.1104/pp.111.172254 · DOI
  8. 10.1016/j.jplph.2011.05.004 · DOI
  9. 10.1093/pcp/pcq001 · DOI
  10. 10.1093/pcp/pcp066 · DOI
  11. 10.1046/j.1365-313x.2001.01096.x · DOI
  12. 10.1271/bbb.80407 · DOI
  13. 10.1093/pcp/pcq145 · DOI
  14. 10.1271/bbb.100340 · DOI
  15. 10.1093/emboj/cdg277 · DOI
  16. 10.1105/tpc.010261 · DOI
  17. 10.1371/journal.pbio.0040327 · DOI
  18. 10.1104/pp.106.091298 · DOI
  19. 10.1104/pp.110.162750 · DOI
  20. 10.1105/tpc.010210 · DOI
  21. 10.1105/tpc.007906 · DOI
  22. 10.1159/000212749 · DOI
  23. 10.1093/oxfordjournals.pcp.a029444 · DOI
  24. 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2009.04054.x · DOI
  25. 10.1146/annurev.arplant.49.1.249 · DOI
  26. 10.1023/A:1020895306588 · DOI
  27. 10.1046/j.1365-313X.2002.01328.x · DOI
  28. 10.1038/35021067 · DOI · Paper page
  29. 10.1093/pcp/pcn106 · DOI
  30. 10.1038/35066500 · DOI
  31. 10.1104/pp.103.032250 · DOI
  32. 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2010.04159.x · DOI
  33. 10.1007/s00425-007-0627-7 · DOI
  34. 10.1105/tpc.109.065730 · DOI
  35. 10.1006/bbrc.1995.1106 · DOI
  36. 10.1006/abio.1996.0311 · DOI
  37. 10.1105/tpc.108.063263 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
KHOKON, M. A. R., JAHAN, M. S., RAHMAN, T., HOSSAIN, M. A., MUROYAMA, D., MINAMI, I., MUNEMASA, S., MORI, I. C., NAKAMURA, Y., & MURATA, Y.
Affiliations
  • Okayama University (JP)
  • Institute of Plant Science and Resources, Okayama University (JP)
Corresponding author
MURATA, YOSHIYUKI
Venue
Plant, Cell & Environment
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2011-07-25
Volume
34
Issue
11
Pages
1900-1906
ISSN
  • 0140-7791 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-3040
OpenAlex
W2106912497
Cited by
111
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 8
FWCI
8.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Plant Cell & Environment (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant Stress Responses and Tolerance
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant-Microbe Interactions and Immunity
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Insect Science › Insect-Plant Interactions and Control
Keywords
allyl isothiocyanate, stomatal closure, Arabidopsis thaliana, reactive oxygen species, nitric oxide, intracellular calcium, NADPH oxidase, glutathione, abscisic acid, methyl jasmonate, glucosinolates, isothiocyanates, defense priming, water loss, fungal invasion
MeSH terms
Acetates, Calcium, Cyclopentanes, Cytoplasm, Glutathione, Movement, Mutation, Nitric Oxide, Arabidopsis, Reactive Oxygen Species, Isothiocyanates, Plant Stomata, Oxylipins

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review