Cited by 41Coleoptera Taxonomy and DistributionInvertebrate Taxonomy and EcologyColeoptera: Cerambycidae studies

Identification of net‐winged beetle larvae (Coleoptera: Lycidae) using three mtDNA fragments: a comparison of their utility

LEVKANICOVA, ZUZANA, BOCAK, LADISLAV·2009·Systematic Entomology

Abstract

We investigated the effectiveness of short mitochondrial DNA fragments for the identification of lycid larvae. The rrnL, cox1 and nad5 mtDNA sequences from 17 specimens of immature stages of Lycidae and Lampyridae were combined with a previously published dataset of homologous fragments representing all major lineages of Lycidae and outgroups. Their relationships were analysed under parsimony criteria. We demonstrate that high‐density profiles are necessary for accurate identification of unknown samples to generic and tribal levels and that a multilocus approach is critical for obtaining reliable results. Although widely used, the cox1 mtDNA fragment showed the worst performance for identification at genus level when the query species was not present in the library. Stronger support for deeper branches came from rrnL mtDNA. The neotenic female larvae and male adult stages of Platerodrilus sp. and Macrolibnetis depressus Pic, 1938 were associated by mtDNA fragments. Based on the present identification, larvae of Dictyopterini (Dictyopterini gen. sp., Dictyoptera aurora Herbst, 1784), Sulabanus sp., Leptotrichalus sp. (Metriorrhynchini) and Macrolibnetis depressus Pic, 1938 (Platerodrilini) are described for the first time. Further species of Platycis Thomson, 1859, Plateros Bourgeois, 1979, Macrolycus Waterhouse, 1878, Cautires Waterhouse, 1879 and Lyponia Waterhouse, 1878 are identified by morphology and molecular markers. The data on larval morphology and their usefulness fo…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-3113.2008.00457.x

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A total lack of metamorphosis via type II paedomorphosis is strongly suspected in at least three other lineages within the Lycidae alone.

    “Outside of the Platerodrilini, a total lack of metamorphosis via type II paedomorphosis is strongly suspected in at least three other lineages within the Lycidae alone (Levkanicova & Bocak, 2009; Malohlava & Bocak, 2011; Masek et al. , 2014).”

    From Why grow up? <scp>A</scp> perspective on insect strategies to avoid metamorphosis (2016) · cites this paper as Levkanicova & Bocak, 2009

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
LEVKANICOVA, Z., & BOCAK, L.
Venue
Systematic Entomology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2009-03-19
Volume
34
Issue
2
Pages
210-221
ISSN
  • 0307-6970 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-3113
OpenAlex
W2090877050
Cited by
41
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 5 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
3.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Systematic Entomology (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Grantová Agentura České Republiky
  • Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Coleoptera Taxonomy and Distribution
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Invertebrate Taxonomy and Ecology
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Coleoptera: Cerambycidae studies
Keywords
Lycidae, fireflies, mitochondrial COI, nad5, generic identification, larval morphology, new species description, Coleoptera

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review