The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Herbivore‐induced plant vaccination. Part I. The orchestration of plant defenses in nature and their fitness consequences in the wild tobacco Nicotiana attenuata
Abstract
Summary: A plant's responses to attack from particular pathogens and herbivores may result in resistance to subsequent attack from the same species, but may also affect different species. Such a cross‐resistance, called immunization or vaccination, can benefit the plant, if the fitness consequences of attack from the initial attacker are less than those from subsequent attackers. Here, we report an example of naturally occurring vaccination of the native tobacco plant, Nicotiana attenuata, against Manduca hornworms by prior attack from the mirid bug, Tupiocoris notatus (Dicyphus minimus), which results from the elicitation of two categories of induced plant responses. First, attack from both herbivore species causes the plants in nature to release predator‐attracting volatile organic compounds (VOCs), and the attracted generalist predator, Geocoris pallens, preferentially attacks the less mobile hornworm larvae. Second, attack from both mirids and hornworms increases the accumulation of secondary metabolites and proteinase inhibitors (PIs) in the leaf tissue, which is correlated with the slow growth of Manduca larvae. Mirid damage does not significantly reduce the fitness of the plant in nature, whereas attack from the hornworm reduces lifetime seed production. Consequently, plants that are attacked by mirids realize a significant fitness advantage in environments with both herbivores. The combination of growth‐slowing direct defenses and predator‐attracting indirect defenses results in greater hornworm mortality on mirid‐attacked plants and provides the mechanism of the vaccination phenomenon.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The evolutionary context for herbivore-induced plant volatiles: beyond the ‘cry for help’
Dicke, M., & Baldwin, I. T. (2010) · Trends in Plant Science · doi:10.1016/j.tplants.2009.12.002 · Cited by 1,245
The specificity of herbivore-induced plant volatiles in attracting herbivore enemies
Clavijo McCormick, A., Unsicker, S. B., & Gershenzon, J. (2012) · Trends in Plant Science · doi:10.1016/j.tplants.2012.03.012 · Cited by 566
Nicotine's Defensive Function in Nature
Steppuhn, A., Gase, K., Krock, B., Halitschke, R., & Baldwin, I. T. (2004) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0020217 · Cited by 498
Kessler, A., Halitschke, R., Diezel, C., & Baldwin, I. T. (2006) · Oecologia · doi:10.1007/s00442-006-0365-8 · Cited by 391
Self-citationA Conceptual Framework for Integrated Pest Management
Stenberg, J. A. (2017) · Trends in Plant Science · doi:10.1016/j.tplants.2017.06.010 · Cited by 389
Metadata
- Authors
- Kessler, A., & T. Baldwin, I.
- Venue
- The Plant Journal
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2004-04-08
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 639-649
- ISSN
- 0960-7412 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-313X
- OpenAlex
- W2075203565
- Cited by
- 204
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 15.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Herbivore‐induced plant vaccination. Part I. The orchestration of plant defenses in nature and their fitness consequences in the wild tobacco Nicotiana attenuata. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-313x.2004.02076.x
- The paper
- Kessler, A., & T. Baldwin, I. (2004). Herbivore‐induced plant vaccination. Part I. The orchestration of plant defenses in nature and their fitness consequences in the wild tobacco Nicotiana attenuata. The Plant Journal. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-313x.2004.02076.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.