Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 295

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 38 of the 38 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Genome‐wide expression profiling of the host response to root‐knot nematode infection in Arabidopsisa

Open access
Jammes, Fabien, Lecomte, Philippe, de Almeida‐Engler, Janice, Bitton, Frédérique, Martin‐Magniette, Marie‐Laure, Renou, Jean Pierre, Abad, Pierre, Favery, Bruno·2005·The Plant Journal

Abstract

Summary: During a compatible interaction, root‐knot nematodes (Meloidogyne spp.) induce the redifferentiation of root cells into multinucleate nematode feeding cells (giant cells). Hyperplasia and hypertrophy of the surrounding cells leads to the formation of a root gall. We investigated the plant response to root‐knot nematodes by carrying out a global analysis of gene expression during gall formation in Arabidopsis, using giant cell‐enriched root tissues. Among 22 089 genes monitored with the complete Arabidopsis transcriptome microarray gene‐specific tag, we identified 3373 genes that display significant differential expression between uninfected root tissues and galls at different developmental stages. Quantitative PCR analysis and the use of promoter GUS fusions confirmed the changes in mRNA levels observed in our microarray analysis. We showed that a comparable number of genes were found to be up‐ and downregulated, indicating that gene downregulation might be essential to allow proper gall formation. Moreover, many genes belonging to the same family are differently regulated in feeding cells. This genome‐wide overview of gene expression during plant–nematode interaction provides new insights into nematode feeding‐cell formation, and highlights that the suppression of plant defence is associated with nematode feeding‐site development.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-313x.2005.02532.x

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 38 references

Cited by

See all 295

Metadata

Authors
Jammes, F., Lecomte, P., de Almeida‐Engler, J., Bitton, F., Martin‐Magniette, M., Renou, J. P., Abad, P., & Favery, B.
Venue
The Plant Journal
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2005-10-07
Volume
44
Issue
3
Pages
447-458
ISSN
  • 0960-7412 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-313X
OpenAlex
W2162145176
Cited by
295
References
38
FWCI
20.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Genome‐wide expression profiling of the host response to root‐knot nematode infection in Arabidopsisa. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-313x.2005.02532.x
The paper
Jammes, F., Lecomte, P., de Almeida‐Engler, J., Bitton, F., Martin‐Magniette, M., Renou, J. P., Abad, P., & Favery, B. (2005). Genome‐wide expression profiling of the host response to root‐knot nematode infection in Arabidopsisa. The Plant Journal. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-313x.2005.02532.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.