The DOI matches its Crossref record; 123 of the 123 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Research on plant abiotic stress responses in the post‐genome era: past, present and future
Open accessAbstract
Summary: Understanding abiotic stress responses in plants is an important and challenging topic in plant research. Physiological and molecular biological analyses have allowed us to draw a picture of abiotic stress responses in various plants, and determination of the Arabidopsis genome sequence has had a great impact on this research field. The availability of the complete genome sequence has facilitated access to essential information for all genes, e.g. gene products and their function, transcript levels, putative cis‐ regulatory elements, and alternative splicing patterns. These data have been obtained from comprehensive transcriptome analyses and studies using full‐length cDNA collections and T‐DNA‐ or transposon‐tagged mutant lines, which were also enhanced by genome sequence information. Moreover, studies on novel regulatory mechanisms involving use of small RNA molecules, chromatin modulation and genomic DNA modification have enabled us to recognize that plants have evolved complicated and sophisticated systems in response to complex abiotic stresses. Integrated data obtained with various ‘omics’ approaches have provided a more comprehensive picture of abiotic stress responses. In addition, research on stress responses in various plant species other than Arabidopsis has increased our knowledge regarding the mechanisms of plant stress tolerance in nature. Based on this progress, improvements in crop stress tolerance have been attempted by means of gene transfer and marker‐assisted breeding. In this review, we summarize recent progress in abiotic stress studies, especially in the post‐genomic era, and offer new perspectives on research directions for the next decade.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Significant differences that are observed for short durations under controlled laboratory or glasshouse conditions may yield only minor or negligible improvement once in the field (Hirayama and Shinozaki, 2010;Atkinson and Urwin, 2012).”
From Genetic resources and precise gene editing for targeted improvement of barley abiotic stress tolerance (2023) · cites this paper as Hirayama and Shinozaki, 2010
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Europe-wide reduction in primary productivity caused by the heat and drought in 2003
Ciais, P., Reichstein, M., Viovy, N., Granier, A., Ogée, J., Allard, V., Aubinet, M., Buchmann, N., Bernhofer, C., Carrara, A., et al. (2005) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature03972 · Cited by 4,153
Abiotic stress, the field environment and stress combination
Mittler, R. (2006) · Trends in Plant Science · doi:10.1016/j.tplants.2005.11.002 · Cited by 3,083
Abscisic Acid Inhibits Type 2C Protein Phosphatases via the PYR/PYL Family of START Proteins
Park, S., Fung, P., Nishimura, N., Jensen, D. R., Fujii, H., Zhao, Y., Lumba, S., Santiago, J., Rodrigues, A., Chow, T.-F. F., et al. (2009) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1173041 · Cited by 2,986
Yamaguchi‐Shinozaki, K., & Shinozaki, K. (2006) · Annual Review of Plant Biology · doi:10.1146/annurev.arplant.57.032905.105444 · Cited by 2,935
Self-citationSalinity tolerance in halophytes*
Flowers, T. J., & Colmer, T. D. (2008) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.2008.02531.x · Cited by 2,789
The complex language of chromatin regulation during transcription
Berger, S. L. (2007) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature05915 · Cited by 2,768
MicroRNAs AND THEIR REGULATORY ROLES IN PLANTS
Jones-Rhoades, M. W., Bartel, D. P., & Bartel, B. (2006) · Annual Review of Plant Biology · doi:10.1146/annurev.arplant.57.032905.105218 · Cited by 2,720
Gene networks involved in drought stress response and tolerance
Shinozaki, K., & Yamaguchi‐Shinozaki, K. (2006) · Journal of Experimental Botany · doi:10.1093/jxb/erl164 · Cited by 2,641
Self-citationDrought and Salt Tolerance in Plants
Bartels, D., & Sunkar, R. (2005) · Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences · doi:10.1080/07352680590910410 · Cited by 2,611
Regulators of PP2C Phosphatase Activity Function as Abscisic Acid Sensors
Ma, Y., Szostkiewicz, I., Korte, A., Moes, D., Yang, Y., Christmann, A., & Grill, E. (2009) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1172408 · Cited by 2,467
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Agricultural uses of plant biostimulants
Calvo, P., Nelson, L. M., & Kloepper, J. W. (2014) · Plant and Soil · doi:10.1007/s11104-014-2131-8 · Cited by 2,561
Drought, salt, and temperature stress-induced metabolic rearrangements and regulatory networks
Krasensky-Wrzaczek, J., & Jonak, C. (2012) · Journal of Experimental Botany · doi:10.1093/jxb/err460 · Cited by 2,295
Bita, C. E., & Gerats, T. (2013) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2013.00273 · Cited by 1,896
Fang, Y., & Xiong, L. (2014) · Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences · doi:10.1007/s00018-014-1767-0 · Cited by 1,455
Nakabayashi, R., Yonekura‐Sakakibara, K., Urano, K., Suzuki, M., Yamada, Y., Nishizawa, T., Matsuda, F., Kojima, M., Sakakibara, H., Shinozaki, K., et al. (2013) · The Plant Journal · doi:10.1111/tpj.12388 · Cited by 1,346
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Hirayama, T., & Shinozaki, K.
- Affiliations
- RIKEN Advanced Science Institute (JP)
- RIKEN Center for Sustainable Resource Science (JP)
- Corresponding author
- Shinozaki, Kazuo
- Venue
- The Plant Journal
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2010-03
- Volume
- 61
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1041-1052
- ISSN
- 0960-7412 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-313X
- OpenAlex
- W2070923407
- Cited by
- 1,215
- References
- 123
- Citations by year
- 2026: 30 · 2025: 57 · 2024: 70 · 2023: 63 · 2022: 94 · 2021: 115 · 2020: 84 · 2019: 80 · 2018: 72 · 2017: 67 · 2016: 85 · 2015: 81 · 2014: 75 · 2013: 87 · 2012: 62
- FWCI
- 7.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- The Plant Journal (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology
- Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
- RIKEN
- Advanced Science Institute
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant Stress Responses and Tolerance
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant Molecular Biology Research
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant-Microbe Interactions and Immunity
- Keywords
- abiotic stress response, plant stress tolerance, gene expression profiling, cis-regulatory elements, alternative splicing, small RNA, chromatin regulation, multi-omics integration, crop stress tolerance, marker-assisted breeding
- MeSH terms
- Adaptation, Physiological, Plant Growth Regulators, Plants, RNA Processing, Post-Transcriptional, Stress, Physiological, Transcription, Genetic, Signal Transduction, Genes, Plant, Arabidopsis, Gene Expression Regulation, Plant, Genome, Plant, Genomics, RNA, Small Interfering, Epigenesis, Genetic, Metabolome
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
