Cited by 102Insect-Plant Interactions and ControlPlant-Microbe Interactions and ImmunityPlant biochemistry and biosynthesis

Methyl salicylate production in tomato affects biotic interactions: Role of methyl salicylate in tomato defence

Ament, Kai, Krasikov, Vladimir, Allmann, Silke, Rep, Martijn, Takken, Frank L.W., Schuurink, Robert C.·2010·The Plant Journal

Abstract

The role of methyl salicylate (MeSA) production was studied in indirect and direct defence responses of tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) to the spider mite Tetranychus urticae and the root-invading fungus Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. lycopersici, respectively. To this end, we silenced the tomato gene encoding salicylic acid methyl transferase (SAMT). Silencing of SAMT led to a major reduction in SAMT expression and MeSA emission upon herbivory by spider mites, without affecting the induced emission of other volatiles (terpenoids). The predatory mite Phytoseiulus persimilis, which preys on T. urticae, could not discriminate between infested and non-infested SAMT-silenced lines, as it could for wild-type tomato plants. Moreover, when given the choice between infested SAMT-silenced and infested wild-type plants, they preferred the latter. These findings are supportive of a major role for MeSA in this indirect defence response of tomato. SAMT-silenced tomato plants were less susceptible to a virulent strain of F. oxysporum f. sp. lycopersici, indicating that the direct defense responses in the roots are also affected in these plants. Our studies show that the conversion of SA to MeSA can affect both direct and indirect plant defence responses.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-313x.2010.04132.x

Cites

61 of 61 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ament, K., Krasikov, V., Allmann, S., Rep, M., Takken, F. L. W., & Schuurink, R. C.
Affiliations
  • University of Amsterdam (NL)
  • Max Planck Society (DE)
Venue
The Plant Journal
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2010-01-06
Volume
62
Issue
1
Pages
124-134
ISSN
0960-7412 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2123139153
Cited by
102
References
61
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 6
FWCI
9.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Plant Journal (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) (publishedVersion)
  • UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) (submittedVersion)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Insect Science › Insect-Plant Interactions and Control
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant-Microbe Interactions and Immunity
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Plant biochemistry and biosynthesis
Keywords
methyl salicylate, tomato, Tetranychus urticae, Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. lycopersici, indirect plant defense, Phytoseiulus persimilis, plant volatiles, gene silencing
MeSH terms
Animals, Fusarium, Methyltransferases, Mite Infestations, Oils, Volatile, Plant Diseases, Plant Proteins, Predatory Behavior, Salicylates, Terpenes, Gene Expression Regulation, Plant, Plant Roots, Solanum lycopersicum, RNA, Plant, Gene Silencing, Plants, Genetically Modified, Tetranychidae, Host-Pathogen Interactions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review