The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Evolutionary and comparative analysis of MYB and bHLH plant transcription factors
Open accessAbstract
Summary: The expansion of gene families encoding regulatory proteins is typically associated with the increase in complexity characteristic of multi‐cellular organisms. The MYB and basic helix‐loop‐helix (bHLH) families provide excellent examples of how gene duplication and divergence within particular groups of transcription factors are associated with, if not driven by, the morphological and metabolic diversity that characterize the higher plants. These gene families expanded dramatically in higher plants; for example, there are approximately 339 and 162 MYB and bHLH genes, respectively, in Arabidopsis, and approximately 230 and 111, respectively, in rice. In contrast, the Chlamydomonas genome has only 38 MYB genes and eight bHLH genes. In this review, we compare the MYB and bHLH gene families from structural, evolutionary and functional perspectives. The knowledge acquired on the role of many of these factors in Arabidopsis provides an excellent reference to explore sequence–function relationships in crops and other plants. The physical interaction and regulatory synergy between particular sub‐classes of MYB and bHLH factors is perhaps one of the best examples of combinatorial plant gene regulation. However, members of the MYB and bHLH families also interact with a number of other regulatory proteins, forming complexes that either activate or repress the expression of sets of target genes that are increasingly being identified through a diversity of high‐throughput genomic approaches. The next few years are likely to witness an increasing understanding of the extent to which conserved transcription factors participate at similar positions in gene regulatory networks across plant species.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Pfam protein families database
Finn, R. D., Mistry, J., Tate, J., Coggill, P., Heger, A., Pollington, J. E., Gavin, O. L., Gunasekaran, P., Ceric, G., Forslund, K., et al. (2010) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkp985 · Cited by 2,694
Cited by
MYB transcription factors, active players in abiotic stress signaling
Li, C., Ng, C. K.-Y., & Fan, L.-M. (2015) · Environmental and Experimental Botany · doi:10.1016/j.envexpbot.2014.06.014 · Cited by 406
Salih, H., Gong, W., He, S., Sun, G., Sun, J., & Du, X. (2016) · BMC Genetics · doi:10.1186/s12863-016-0436-8 · Cited by 146
Rastogi, S., Shah, S., Kumar, R., Kumar, A., & Shasany, A. K. (2020) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-020-61957-5 · Cited by 39
Li, Q., Kou, M., Li, C., & Zhang, Y.-G. (2021) · Plant Physiology and Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.plaphy.2020.11.035 · Cited by 30
Wang, J., Wang, F., Jin, C., Tong, Y., & Wang, T. (2020) · The Journal of Horticultural Science and Biotechnology · doi:10.1080/14620316.2019.1665480 · Cited by 29
Metadata
- Authors
- Feller, A., Machemer, K., Braun, E. L., & Grotewold, E.
- Venue
- The Plant Journal
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2011-03-28
- Volume
- 66
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 94-116
- ISSN
- 0960-7412 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-313X
- OpenAlex
- W1836238084
- Cited by
- 1,348
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 14.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.