Cited by 72Chromosomal and Genetic VariationsPlant Genetic and Mutation StudiesGenomic variations and chromosomal abnormalities

Transpositional landscape of the rice genome revealed by paired-end mapping of high-throughput re-sequencing data

Open access
Sabot, François, Picault, Nathalie, El‐Baidouri, Moaine, Llauro, Christel, Chaparro, Cristian, Piegu, Benoit, Roulin, Anne, Guiderdoni, Emmanuel +3 more·2011·The Plant Journal

Abstract

Summary: Transposable elements (TEs) are mobile entities that densely populate most eukaryotic genomes and contribute to both their structural and functional dynamics. However, most TE‐related sequences in both plant and animal genomes correspond to inactive, degenerated elements, due to the combined effect of silencing pathways and elimination through deletions. One of the major difficulties in fully characterizing the molecular basis of genetic diversity of a given species lies in establishing its genome‐wide transpositional activity. Here, we provide an extensive survey of the transpositional landscape of a plant genome using a deep sequencing strategy. This was achieved through paired‐end mapping of a fourfold coverage of the genome of rice mutant line derived from an in vitro callus culture using Illumina technology. Our study shows that at least 13 TE families are active in this genotype, causing 34 new insertions. This next‐generation sequencing‐based strategy provides new opportunities to quantify the impact of TEs on the genome dynamics of the species.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-313x.2011.04492.x

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Global DNA methylation is the most evaluated epigenetic somaclonal variation; in plants it is at higher levels than in other eukaryotes and is correlated with expression of different genes and changes in mobility of transposable elements.

    “The most evaluated epigenetic somaclonal variation is global DNA methylation, which, in plants, is at higher levels compared with other eukaryotes, and is correlated with the expression of different genes, and changes in the mobility of the numerous transposable elements presented in plant genomes [99,101,102,103,104,105,106,107,108,109].”

    From Somaclonal Variation—Advantage or Disadvantage in Micropropagation of the Medicinal Plants (2023) · cites this paper as [108]

    The Results and Discussion (page not specified) say that DNA methylation silences one copy of the rice transposable element Tos17, supporting a link between methylation and transposable-element activity. The paper does not establish that global DNA methylation is the most evaluated epigenetic somaclonal variation, that plants have higher methylation levels than other eukaryotes, or that methylation correlates with expression of different genes. It also says whether demethylation activates the other TE families studied remains unresolved. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Hirochika, H., Sugimoto, K., Otsuki, Y., Tsugawa, H. and Kanda, M. (1996) Retrotransposons of rice involved in mutations induced by tissue culture. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 93, 7783-7788.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sabot, F., Picault, N., El‐Baidouri, M., Llauro, C., Chaparro, C., Piegu, B., Roulin, A., Guiderdoni, E., Delabastide, M., McCombie, R., & Panaud, O.
Affiliations
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
  • Centre de Coopération Internationale en Recherche Agronomique pour le Développement (FR)
Corresponding author
Panaud, Olivier
Venue
The Plant Journal
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2011-03
Volume
66
Issue
2
Pages
241-246
ISSN
  • 0960-7412 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-313X
OpenAlex
W1585076338
Cited by
72
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 8
FWCI
11.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Plant Journal (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Institutional Repository (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
  • Agritrop (Cirad) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Chromosomal and Genetic Variations
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant Genetic and Mutation Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genomic variations and chromosomal abnormalities
Keywords
transposable elements, rice genome, rice, transposon insertion, genome dynamics, transposon silencing, transposon families
MeSH terms
Chromosome Mapping, DNA Transposable Elements, Oryza, Genetic Variation, Mutagenesis, Insertional, Sequence Analysis, DNA, DNA, Plant, Genome, Plant, Chromosomes, Plant

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review