Control of pyrethroid‐resistant Anopheles gambiae and Culex quinquefasciatus mosquitoes with chlorfenapyr in Benin
Open accessAbstract
Summary: Objective To compare the efficacy of chlorfenapyr applied on mosquito nets and as an indoor residual spray against populations of Anopheles gambiae and Culex quinquefasciatus in an area of Benin that shows problematic levels of pyrethroid resistance. Method Eight‐week trial conducted in experimental huts. Results Indoor residual spraying killed 82.9% of An. gambiae overall (mean mortality: 79.5%) compared to 53.5% overall (mean mortality: 61.7%) in the hut containing the lower dosed ITN. Analysis of data on a fortnightly basis showed high levels of mosquito mortality and blood‐feeding inhibition during the first few weeks after treatment. Control of C. quinquefasciatus by the IRS and ITN interventions showed a similar trend to that of An. gambiae and though the average level of mortality was lower it was still much higher than with pyrethroid treatments against this population. Chlorfenapyr’s reputation for being rather slow acting was evident particularly at lower dosages. The treatments showed no evidence of excito‐repellent activity in this trial. Conclusion Chlorfenapyr has the potential to control pyrethroid resistant populations of A. gambiae. There is a need to develop long‐lasting formulations of chlorfenapyr to prolong its residual life on nets and sprayed surfaces. On nets it could be combined with a contact irritant pyrethroid to give improved protection against mosquito biting while killing pyrethroid‐resistant mosquitoes that come into contact with the net.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
New AIs that have been explored and are ripe for development lack the important characteristic of repellency.
“New AIs that have been explored and are ripe for development lack the important characteristic of repellency [6,7].”
From Spatial repellents: from discovery and development to evidence-based validation (2012) · cites this paper as [7]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 30 · Cited by 69
- Authors
- N’Guessan, R., Boko, P., Odjo, A., Knols, B., Akogbeto, M., & Rowland, M.
- Affiliations
- Wageningen University & Research (NL)
- London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Rowland, Mark
- Venue
- Tropical Medicine & International Health
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2009-03-11
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 389-395
- ISSN
- 1360-2276 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-3156
- OpenAlex
- W2107765244
- Cited by
- 69
- References
- 30
- Citations by year
- 2023: 12 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 6
- FWCI
- 7.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- research.wur.nl
- Locations
- Tropical Medicine & International Health (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling (acceptedVersion)
- Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation
- London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Malaria Research and Control
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Insect Pest Control Strategies
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Dengue and Mosquito Control Research
- Keywords
- chlorfenapyr, pyrethroid resistance, Anopheles gambiae, Culex quinquefasciatus, indoor residual spraying, insecticide-treated nets, mosquito mortality, blood-feeding inhibition, malaria vector control, residual efficacy, Benin
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Anopheles, Bedding and Linens, Benin, Culex, Insecticide Resistance, Insecticides, Malaria, Mosquito Control, Pyrethrins
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review