Cited by 89Vaccine Coverage and HesitancyGlobal Maternal and Child HealthChild Nutrition and Water Access

Randomized controlled trial to improve childhood immunization adherence in rural Pakistan: redesigned immunization card and maternal education

Open access
Usman, Hussain R., Rahbar, Mohammad H., Kristensen, Sibylle, Vermund, Sten H., Kirby, Russell S., Habib, Faiza, Chamot, Eric·2011·Tropical Medicine & International Health

Abstract

Summary: Objective A substantial dropout from the first dose of diphtheria‐tetanus‐pertussis (DTP1) to the 3rd dose of DTP (DTP3) immunization has been recorded in Pakistan. We conducted a randomized controlled trial to assess the effects of providing a substantially redesigned immunization card, centre‐based education, or both interventions together on DTP3 completion at six rural expanded programme on immunization (EPI) centres in Pakistan. Methods Mother‐child pairs were enrolled at DTP1 and randomized to four study groups: redesigned card, centre‐based education, combined intervention and standard care. Each child was followed up for 90 days to record the dates of DTP2 and DTP3 visits. The study outcome was DTP3 completion by the end of follow‐up period in each study group. Results We enrolled 378 mother–child pairs in redesigned card group, 376 in centre‐based education group, 374 in combined intervention group and 378 in standard care group. By the end of follow‐up, 39% of children in standard care group completed DTP3. Compared to this, a significantly higher proportion of children completed DTP3 in redesigned card group (66%) (crude risk ratio [RR] = 1.7; 95% CI = 1.5, 2.0), centre‐based education group (61%) (RR = 1.5; 95% CI = 1.3, 1.8) and combined intervention group (67%) (RR = 1.7; 95% CI = 1.4, 2.0). Conclusions Improved immunization card alone, education to mothers alone, or both together were all effective in increasing follow‐up immunization visits. The study underscores the potential of study interventions’ public health impact and necessitates their evaluation for complete EPI schedule at a large scale in the EPI system.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-3156.2010.02698.x

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The highest median effect size was among educational interventions (median = 6.25).

    “However, the highest median effect size was among educational interventions (median = 6.25)19,20.”

    From Last-mile delivery increases vaccine uptake in Sierra Leone (2024) · cites this paper as [19]

    The Results report risk ratios for individual trial groups, not median effect sizes across intervention categories. The Discussion says the redesigned card was more effective than education alone in this trial, but does not assess which category had the highest median effect size. Searches for “6.25” and “median educational interventions effect size” found no matching result in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 23

  1. Alto WA Alk S Pinau D Polume H 1989 Improving immunization coverage, a comparison between traditional MCH teams and MCH teams plus aid post orderlies P N G Med J 32 97 100 2816078
  2. Batt K Fox-Rushby JA Castillo-Riquelme M 2004 The costs, effects and cost-effectiveness of strategies to increase coverage of routine immunizations in low- and middle-income countries: systematic review of the grey literature Bull World Health Organ 82 689 696 15628207 PMC2622984
  3. Brugha RF Kevany JP 1996 Maximizing immunization coverage through home visits: a controlled trial in an urban area of Ghana Bull World Health Organ 74 517 524 9002332 PMC2486871
  4. Chen ST 1976 The improvement of immunization coverage by early immunisation of children in Malaysia Med J Malaysia 31 17 19 1023007
  5. Chen ST 1989 Influence of immunization schedule on immunization coverage J Trop Med Hyg 92 386 390 2607571
  6. Coetzee DJ Ferrinho P Reinach SG 1993 A vaccination survey using the EPI methodology to evaluate the impact of a child health outreach programme in an urban area of South Africa Bull World Health Organ 71 33 39 8440035 PMC2393421
  7. Cutts FT Phillips M Kortbeek S Soares A 1990 Door-to-door canvassing for immunization program acceleration in Mozambique: achievements and costs Int J Health Serv 20 717 725 2125030
  8. Dominguez Uga MA 1988 Economic analysis of the vaccination strategies adopted in Brazil in 1982 Bull Pan Am Health Organ 22 250 268 3147117
  9. Kuhn L Zwarenstein M 1990 Evaluation of a village health worker programme: the use of village health worker retained records Int J Epidemiol 19 685 692 2262265
  10. Maher CP Hall JJ Yakam W Naupa M Leonard D 1993 Improving vaccination coverage: the experience of the Expanded Programme on Immunization in Vanuatu P N G Med J 36 228 233 8059549
  11. Main B Lower T James R Rouse I 2001 Changes in Expanded Program for Immunization coverage for mother and child in Krakor, Cambodia 1996–1998 Trop Med Int Health 6 526 528 11469945
  12. Mukanga DO Kiguli S 2006 Factors affecting the retention and use of child health cards in a slum community in Kampala, Uganda, 2005 Matern Child Health J 10 545 552 16850275
  13. Pegurri E Fox-Rushby JA Damian W 2005 The effects and costs of expanding the coverage of immunisation services in developing countries: a systematic literature review Vaccine 23 1624 1635 15694515
  14. Robinson JS Burkhalter BR Rasmussen B Sugiono R 2001 Low-cost on-the-job peer training of nurses improved immunization coverage in Indonesia Bull World Health Organ 79 150 158 11242822 PMC2566354
  15. San Sebastian M Goicolea I Aviles J Narvaez M 2001 Improving immunization coverage in rural areas of Ecuador: a cost-effectiveness analysis Trop Doct 31 21 24 11205594
  16. Skov T Deddens J Petersen MR Endahl L 1998 Prevalence proportion ratios: estimation and hypothesis testing Int J Epidemiol 27 91 95 9563700
  17. Spiegelman D Hertzmark E 2005 Easy SAS calculations for risk or prevalence ratios and differences Am J Epidemiol 162 199 200 15987728
  18. Torun SD Bakirci N 2006 Vaccination coverage and reasons for non-vaccination in a district of Istanbul BMC Public Health 6 125 16677375 PMC1464125
  19. Usman HR Akhtar S Habib F Jehan I 2009 Redesigned immunization card and center-based education to reduce childhood immunization dropouts in urban Pakistan: a randomized controlled trial Vaccine 27 467 472 18996423
  20. van Zwanenberg TD Hull C 1988 Improving immunisation: coverage in a province in Papua New Guinea Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 296 1654 1656 PMC2546166 3135060
  21. Wacholder S 1986 Binomial regression in GLIM: estimating risk ratios and risk differences Am J Epidemiol 123 174 184 3509965
  22. Zocchetti C Consonni D Bertazzi PA 1995 Estimation of prevalence rate ratios from cross-sectional data Int J Epidemiol 24 1064 1067 8557441
  23. Zou G 2004 A modified poisson regression approach to prospective studies with binary data Am J Epidemiol 159 702 706 15033648

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Usman, H. R., Rahbar, M. H., Kristensen, S., Vermund, S. H., Kirby, R. S., Habib, F., & Chamot, E.
Affiliations
  • University of Alabama at Birmingham (US)
  • The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (US)
  • Vanderbilt University (US)
  • University of South Florida (US)
  • Aga Khan University (PK)
Corresponding author
Usman, Hussain R.
Venue
Tropical Medicine & International Health
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2010-12-15
Volume
16
Issue
3
Pages
334-342
ISSN
  • 1360-2276 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-3156
OpenAlex
W1586918305
Cited by
89
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 3
FWCI
2.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Tropical Medicine & International Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • eCommons - AKU (Aga Khan University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • University of Alabama at Birmingham
  • National Institutes of Health
  • Fogarty International Center (D43TW005497)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Global Maternal and Child Health
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Child Nutrition and Water Access
Keywords
childhood immunization, vaccine adherence, DTP vaccine, maternal education, Expanded Programme on Immunization, rural Pakistan, immunization dropout, mother-child pairs
MeSH terms
Assessment of Medication Adherence, Adolescent, Adult, Female, Health Education, Humans, Immunization Schedule, Infant, Infant, Newborn, Medical Records, Mothers, Pakistan, Patient Dropouts, Socioeconomic Factors, Diphtheria-Tetanus-Pertussis Vaccine, Drug Monitoring, Rural Health Services, Mass Vaccination, Medication Adherence, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review