Cited by 90Vaccine Coverage and HesitancyGlobal Maternal and Child HealthChild and Adolescent Health

Can lay health workers increase the uptake of childhood immunisation? Systematic review and typology

Open access
Glenton, Claire, Scheel, Inger B., Lewin, Simon, Swingler, George H.·2011·Tropical Medicine & International Health

Abstract

Summary: Objectives Lay health workers (LHWs) are used in many settings to increase immunisation uptake among children. However, little is known about the effectiveness of these interventions. The objective of this review was to assess the effects of LHW interventions on childhood immunisation uptake. Methods We searched Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, British Nursing Index and Archive, AMED, POPLINE and WHOLIS, reference lists of included papers and relevant reviews, and contacted the authors of relevant papers. We selected randomised and non‐randomised controlled trials, controlled before–after studies, and interrupted time series of any intervention delivered by LHWs and designed to increase childhood immunisation uptake. Two authors independently extracted data using a standard form and assessed risk of bias and evidence quality. Findings We identified twelve studies, ten of which were randomised controlled trials. Seven studies were conducted among economically disadvantaged populations in high‐income countries. Five studies were from low‐ and middle‐income countries. In ten studies, LHWs promoted childhood immunisation. In two studies, LHWs vaccinated children themselves. In most of the studies, the control group populations received no intervention or standard care. Most of the studies showed that LHWs increased immunisation coverage. However, study settings were diverse, allowing us to carry out only one meta‐analysis including four studies. Conclusion LHWs could make an important contribution to achieving the Millennium Development Goal for child health. However, more high‐quality studies are needed, particularly from LMICs. More studies are also needed to assess the effects of using LHWs to vaccinate children themselves.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-3156.2011.02813.x

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Glenton, C., Scheel, I. B., Lewin, S., & Swingler, G. H.
Affiliations
  • SINTEF (NO)
  • Nasjonalt Kunnskapssenter for Helsetjenesten (NO)
  • University of Cape Town (ZA)
Corresponding author
Glenton, Claire
Venue
Tropical Medicine & International Health
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2011-06-28
Volume
16
Issue
9
Pages
1044-1053
ISSN
  • 1360-2276 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-3156
OpenAlex
W1908372592
Cited by
90
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 2
FWCI
0.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Tropical Medicine & International Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Norges Forskningsråd
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Global Maternal and Child Health
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Child and Adolescent Health
Keywords
lay health workers, childhood immunization, vaccine uptake, vaccination coverage, community health workers, health promotion interventions, low- and middle-income countries, Millennium Development Goals, child health
MeSH terms
Allied Health Personnel, Child, Preschool, Community Health Workers, Community Health Services, Female, Health Promotion, Humans, Male, Patient Education as Topic, Primary Health Care, Immunization Programs, Developed Countries, Information Dissemination

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review