Cited by 14Poisoning and overdose treatmentsForensic Toxicology and Drug AnalysisPharmaceutical Quality and Counterfeiting

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Health risks of using mothballs in Greater Accra, Ghana

Soghoian, S., Nyadedzor, C., Ed Nignpense, B., Clarke, E. E. K., Hoffman, R. S.·2012·Tropical Medicine & International Health

Abstract

Objective Internal use of ‘camphor’ is a potential public health concern in Accra. We sought to identify the toxins being sold as mothballs in Greater Accra and use this information to help educate both clinicians and the public. Methods Mothballs are commonly sold by street and marketplace vendors in unmarked cling film‐wrapped packs. Fifteen small packs of mothballs were purchased from random vendors in three major markets and six roadside stands in Greater Accra. All samples were subjected to the float test; one sample was confirmed by gas chromatography/mass spectroscopy. Results All samples sank in tap water but floated in a saturated salt solution, consistent with naphthalene. The analysed sample was identified as naphthalene. Conclusion Naphthalene was most likely the primary ingredient in all the mothballs purchased for the study. Naphthalene is poorly soluble in water, and ‘camphor water’ is unlikely to cause harm. However, ideas about the efficacy of ‘camphor’ as a purification tool may lead to therapeutic misuse by analogy. A high prevalence of G6PD in the Ghanaian population may increase the risk of toxic haematologic effects from ingestion of mothballs. Mothballs known in Greater Accra as ‘camphor’ are likely to be predominantly naphthalene. A public awareness campaign about the health risks of mothball ingestion is planned.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-3156.2011.02885.x

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Soghoian S, 2009, Health‐seeking behavior after unintentional poisoning in Greater Accra (abstract), Clinical Toxicology, 47, 705

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Soghoian, S., Nyadedzor, C., Ed Nignpense, B., Clarke, E. E. K., & Hoffman, R. S.
Affiliations
  • New York University (US)
  • Ghana Health Service (GH)
Corresponding author
Soghoian, S.
Venue
Tropical Medicine & International Health
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2011-10-04
Volume
17
Issue
1
Pages
135-138
ISSN
  • 1360-2276 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-3156
OpenAlex
W1541690887
Cited by
14
References
8
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2013: 1
FWCI
0.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Tropical Medicine & International Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Poisoning and overdose treatments
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Toxicology › Forensic Toxicology and Drug Analysis
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Pharmaceutical Quality and Counterfeiting
Keywords
mothballs, naphthalene, camphor, glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase, street vendors, Greater Accra Region, public health risk
MeSH terms
Animals, Camphor, Commerce, Ghana, Glucosephosphate Dehydrogenase Deficiency, Humans, Insect Repellents, Moths, Naphthalenes, Public Health, Solubility, Water, Hazardous Substances

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review