Cited by 199Skin Protection and AgingSkin and Cellular Biology ResearchElasticity and Material Modeling

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 17 of the 17 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

In Vivo Studies of the Evolution of Physical Properties of the Human Skin with Age

Leveque, J. L., Corcuff, P., Rigal, J. de, Agache, P.·1984·International Journal of Dermatology

Abstract

In vivo measurements taken by valid methods, help to interpret the phenomena associated with the aging process. The authors developed some routine techniques to measure physical properties of the skin both deep in the dermis-epidermis and at the surface (stratum corneum). Measurements on the forearm of 150 people yielded the following results regarding the dermis-epidermis level: (1) skin thickness begins to decrease at 45 years of age for men and women, when women's skin becomes thinner than men's skin; (2) torsion extensibility, normalized for a given skin thickness, sharply decreases after 35 years of age; (3) skin optical properties are modified, ie the photoplethysmographic signal, measured on the forehead, greatly increase after 60 years of age; (4) at the cutaneous surface level, the main modifications are increased shedding of stratum corneum after 60 years of age in parallel with a modification of the stratum corneum cohesivity, altered skin microrelief during the aging process, and slightly decreased transepidermal water loss while the corneocyte projected size increases. These findings allow consideration of the aging process at the skin level as a phased process. The alterations of the physical properties and their kinetics suggest a various process according to the different cutaneous sections.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-4362.1984.tb04061.x

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 17 references

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Corcuff P, 1982, Quantitative aspect of corneocyte, J Soc Cosmet Chem, 33, 1
  2. Corcuff P, 1982, Image analysis of the cutaneous microrelief: Bioengineering and the skin, Newsletters, 4, 16
  3. Buissou H, 1973, Cutaneous Aging: Its relation with arteriosclerosis and atheroma, Front Matrix Biol, 1, 190

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 199

Metadata

Authors
Leveque, J. L., Corcuff, P., Rigal, J. D., & Agache, P.
Venue
International Journal of Dermatology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1984-06
Volume
23
Issue
5
Pages
322-329
ISSN
  • 0011-9059 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-4632
OpenAlex
W2069059900
Cited by
199
References
17
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 9
FWCI
1.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Dermatology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Skin Protection and Aging
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Skin and Cellular Biology Research
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Elasticity and Material Modeling
Keywords
skin aging, skin thickness, skin optical properties, photoplethysmography, stratum corneum, skin microrelief, transepidermal water loss, forearm skin
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aging, Child, Dermatoglyphics, Elasticity, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Plethysmography, Skin, Skin Physiological Phenomena, Skin Temperature, Skinfold Thickness, Stress, Mechanical, Water Loss, Insensible

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review