The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Biotic indirect effects: a neglected concept in invasion biology
Open accessAbstract
Indirect effects involve more than two species and are defined as how one species alters the effect that another species has on a third. These complex interactions are often overlooked in studies of interactions between alien and native species, and their role in influencing biological invasions has been rarely considered. Based on a comprehensive review of the invasion biology literature, we examine the evidence for the occurrence of four of the most commonly documented indirect effects (apparent competition, indirect mutualism/commensalism, exploitative competition, and trophic cascades) in the invasion process. Studies investigating indirect effects in the context of invasion biology are relatively rare, but have been increasing in recent years, and there are sufficient examples to indicate that this kind of interaction is likely to be more common than is currently recognized. Whether indirect interactions are mediated by an alien or a native species, and whether they occur between ecologically similar or dissimilar alien and native species, depends in part on the type of interaction considered and no predictable patterns were detected in the literature. Further empirical studies will help to elucidate such patterns. At this stage, the inherent unpredictability of indirect interactions means that their impacts in relation to invasions are particularly challenging for land managers to deal with, and their role in invasions is a complex, but is a valuable area of investigation for researchers.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Positive Interactions of Nonindigenous Species: Invasional Meltdown?
Simberloff, D., & Von Holle, B. (1999) · Biological Invasions · doi:10.1023/a:1010086329619 · Cited by 2,231
McIntosh, A. R., & Townsend, C. R. (1996) · Oecologia · doi:10.1007/bf00333229 · Cited by 240
The impact of an invasive weed Tradescantia fluminensis on native forest regeneration
Standish, R. J., Robertson, A. W., & Williams, P. A. (2001) · Journal of Applied Ecology · doi:10.1046/j.0021-8901.2001.00673.x · Cited by 189
Cited by
Catford, J. A., Jansson, R., & Nilsson, C. (2009) · Diversity and Distributions · doi:10.1111/j.1472-4642.2008.00521.x · Cited by 1,154
Progress toward understanding the ecological impacts of nonnative species
Ricciardi, A., Hoopes, M. F., Marchetti, M. P., & Lockwood, J. L. (2013) · Ecological Monographs · doi:10.1890/13-0183.1 · Cited by 760
Resource competition in plant invasions: emerging patterns and research needs
Gioria, M., & Osborne, B. A. (2014) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2014.00501 · Cited by 437
Impacts of Invasive Species on Food Webs
David, P., Thébault, E., Anneville, O., Duyck, P.-F., Chapuis, E., & Loeuille, N. (2017) · Advances in Ecological Research · doi:10.1016/bs.aecr.2016.10.001 · Cited by 391
Catford, J. A., Vesk, P. A., Richardson, D. M., & Pyšek, P. (2012) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2486.2011.02549.x · Cited by 305
Metadata
- Authors
- White, E. M., Wilson, J. C., & Clarke, A. R.
- Venue
- Diversity and Distributions
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2006-06-16
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 443-455
- ISSN
- 0967-9952 (ISSN-L)
- 1366-9516
- 1472-4642
- OpenAlex
- W2041363992
- Cited by
- 357
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 13.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Biotic indirect effects: a neglected concept in invasion biology. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1366-9516.2006.00265.x
- The paper
- White, E. M., Wilson, J. C., & Clarke, A. R. (2006). Biotic indirect effects: a neglected concept in invasion biology. Diversity and Distributions. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1366-9516.2006.00265.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.