CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 54Contact Dermatitis and AllergiesDermatology and Skin DiseasesSkin Protection and Aging

Photocontact dermatitis

Deleo, Vincent A.·2004·Dermatologic Therapy
DOI 10.1111/j.1396-0296.2004.04026.x
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Photocontact dermatitis is not a common condition, but neither is it rare. Both photo-irritant contact dermatitis (PICD) and photoallergic contact dermatitis (PACD) are seen by most dermatologists in general practice. PICD is diagnosed on clinical grounds and is usually caused by furocoumarins in plants like limes and celery. PACD is caused primarily by sunscreens but can also be the result of fragrances and antibacterial agents. PACD can only be diagnosed by photo-patch testing that most dermatologists, even those who patch test and give phototherapy in their office, do not perform. The procedure as outlined in this manuscript is relatively simple and can easily be accomplished in the dermatologist's office.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1396-0296.2004.04026.x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Oxybenzone has been regarded as the most allergic agent and has been implicated in many contact and photoallergic dermatitis cases.

    “First, this active has been regarded as the most allergic agent and has been implicated for many contact and photoallergic dermatitis (82,83).”

    From Photoprotection: a Review of the Current and Future Technologies (2010) · cites this paper as [83]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Deleo, V. A.
Affiliations
St. Luke's-Roosevelt Hospital Center (US)
Corresponding author
Deleo, Vincent A.
Venue
Dermatologic Therapy
Publisher
Hindawi Limited
Published
2004-09
Volume
17
Issue
4
Pages
279-288
ISSN
  • 1396-0296 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-8019
DOI
10.1111/j.1396-0296.2004.04026.x
OpenAlex
W4243647053
Cited by
54
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 5 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 4 · 2012: 1
FWCI
2.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
doi.wiley.com/10.1002/tdm_license_1.1 (tdm, 4017 d)
Locations
  • Dermatologic Therapy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Contact Dermatitis and Allergies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Dermatology and Skin Diseases
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Skin Protection and Aging
Keywords
photocontact dermatitis, photoallergic contact dermatitis, furocoumarins, sunscreen, photopatch testing, lime, celery, fragrance, antibacterial agents, phototherapy
MeSH terms
Allergens, Female, Hand Dermatoses, Humans, Leg Dermatoses, Male, Patch Tests, Primary Prevention, Prognosis, Severity of Illness Index, Sunscreening Agents, Dermatitis, Allergic Contact, Dermatitis, Photoallergic, Dermatitis, Phototoxic, Risk Assessment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review