Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 574

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The management of anaphylaxis in childhood: position paper of the European academy of allergology and clinical immunology

Open access
Muraro, A., Roberts, G., Clark, A., Eigenmann, P. A., Halken, S., Lack, G., Moneret‐Vautrin, A., Niggemann, B., Rancé, F., EAACI Task Force on Anaphylaxis in Children·2007·Allergy

Abstract

Anaphylaxis is a growing paediatric clinical emergency that is difficult to diagnose because a consensus definition was lacking until recently. Many European countries have no specific guidelines for anaphylaxis. This position paper prepared by the EAACI Taskforce on Anaphylaxis in Children aims to provide practical guidelines for managing anaphylaxis in childhood based on the limited evidence available. Intramuscular adrenaline is the acknowledged first‐line therapy for anaphylaxis, in hospital and in the community, and should be given as soon as the condition is recognized. Additional therapies such as volume support, nebulized bronchodilators, antihistamines or corticosteroids are supplementary to adrenaline. There are no absolute contraindications to administering adrenaline in children. Allergy assessment is mandatory in all children with a history of anaphylaxis because it is essential to identify and avoid the allergen to prevent its recurrence. A tailored anaphylaxis management plan is needed, based on an individual risk assessment, which is influenced by the child’s previous allergic reactions, other medical conditions and social circumstances. Collaborative partnerships should be established, involving school staff, healthcare professionals and patients’ organizations. Absolute indications for prescribing self‐injectable adrenaline are prior cardiorespiratory reactions, exercise‐induced anaphylaxis, idiopathic anaphylaxis and persistent asthma with food allergy. Relative indications include peanut or tree nut allergy, reactions to small quantities of a given food, food allergy in teenagers and living far away from a medical facility. The creation of national and European databases is expected to generate better‐quality data and help develop a stepwise approach for a better management of paediatric anaphylaxis.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1398-9995.2007.01421.x

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 574

Metadata

Authors
Muraro, A., Roberts, G., Clark, A., Eigenmann, P. A., Halken, S., Lack, G., Moneret‐Vautrin, A., Niggemann, B., Rancé, F., & EAACI Task Force on Anaphylaxis in Children
Venue
Allergy
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2007-06-21
Volume
62
Issue
8
Pages
857-871
ISSN
  • 0105-4538 (ISSN-L)
  • 1398-9995
OpenAlex
W2100544795
Cited by
574
References
2
FWCI
18.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The management of anaphylaxis in childhood: position paper of the European academy of allergology and clinical immunology. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1398-9995.2007.01421.x
The paper
Muraro, A., Roberts, G., Clark, A., Eigenmann, P. A., Halken, S., Lack, G., Moneret‐Vautrin, A., Niggemann, B., Rancé, F., & EAACI Task Force on Anaphylaxis in Children. (2007). The management of anaphylaxis in childhood: position paper of the European academy of allergology and clinical immunology. Allergy. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1398-9995.2007.01421.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.