How to assess disease activity in patients with chronic urticaria?
Abstract
Background The current EAACI/GA(2)LEN/EDF guidelines recommend assessing disease activity in chronic urticaria (CU) by using an established and well-defined symptom score, i.e. the urticaria activity score (UAS), which combines daily wheal numbers and pruritus intensity. However, this UAS has never been formally tested for its suitability in assessing CU activity. Aim To determine the UAS correlation with quality of life (QoL) in CU patients and to compare the UAS to other symptom scores. Methods Chronic urticaria symptoms (wheals, erythema, angioedema, pruritus) were assessed on seven consecutive days in 111 CU patients for their numbers, duration, size, and/or intensity. Quality of life was assessed by using the Dermatology Life Quality Index. Both, urticaria activity and QoL were determined before and after a 3-week period, in which the patients followed a pseudoallergen-low diet. Results Urticaria activity score values correlated positively, albeit weakly, with QoL impairment in CU patients (r(2) = 0.31, P Conclusions Our findings back the current guideline recommendations to use the UAS for monitoring disease activity in CU patients. Urticaria activity score mean values of at least four consecutive days should be used.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Albers, R., Bourdet-Sicard, R., Braun, D., Calder, P. C., Herz, U., Lambert, C., Lenoir-Wijnkoop, I., Méheust, A., Ouwehand, A., Phothirath, P., et al. (2013) · British Journal of Nutrition · doi:10.1017/s0007114513001505 · Cited by 150 · see citing works
Neisinger, S., Sousa Pinto, B., Ramanauskaite, A., Bousquet, J., Weller, K., Metz, M., Magerl, M., Kocatürk, E., Cherrez‐Ojeda, I., Gimenez‐Arnau, A. M., et al. (2024) · Clinical and Translational Allergy · doi:10.1002/clt2.12328 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
Self-citationLe Fourn, E., Giraudeau, B., Chosidow, O., Doutre, M.-S., & Lorette, G. (2013) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0070717 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Could distress tolerance levels be associated with the severity of chronic spontaneous urticaria?
Göçer Gürok, N., Gürok, M. G., & Öztürk, S. (2022) · TURKDERM · doi:10.4274/turkderm.galenos.2022.46793
- Authors
- Młynek, A., Zalewska‐Janowska, A., Martus, P., Staubach, P., Zuberbier, T., & Maurer, M.
- Affiliations
- Medical University of Lodz (PL)
- Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin (DE)
- University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Maurer, M.
- Venue
- Allergy
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2008-04-25
- Volume
- 63
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 777-780
- ISSN
- 0105-4538 (ISSN-L)
- 1398-9995
- OpenAlex
- W2127951211
- Cited by
- 385
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 17 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 29 · 2018: 36 · 2017: 34 · 2016: 30 · 2015: 28 · 2014: 21 · 2013: 30 · 2012: 11
- FWCI
- 6.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Allergy (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › Urticaria and Related Conditions
- Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Mast cells and histamine
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Immunology and Allergy › Food Allergy and Anaphylaxis Research
- Keywords
- chronic urticaria, urticaria activity score, disease activity assessment, quality of life, symptom scores, pruritus, wheals, angioedema, Dermatology Life Quality Index, disease surveillance
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Angioedema, Chronic Disease, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Pruritus, Quality of Life, Surveys and Questionnaires, Urticaria, Practice Guidelines as Topic
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review