Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 731

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

EAACI/GA2LEN/EDF/WAO guideline: definition, classification and diagnosis of urticaria

Open access
Zuberbier, T., Asero, R., Bindslev‐Jensen, C., Walter Canonica, G., Church, M. K., Giménez‐Arnau, A., Grattan, C. E. H., Kapp, A., Merk, H. F., Rogala, B., Saini, S., Sánchez‐Borges, M., Schmid‐Grendelmeier, P., Schünemann, H., Staubach, P., Vena, G. A., Wedi, B., Maurer, M.·2009·Allergy

Abstract

This guideline, together with its sister guideline on the management of urticaria [Zuberbier T, Asero R, Bindslev‐Jensen C, Canonica GW, Church MK, Giménez‐Arnau AM et al. EAACI/GA²LEN/EDF/WAO Guideline: Management of urticaria. Allergy, 2009; 64:1427–1443] is the result of a consensus reached during a panel discussion at the 3rd International Consensus Meeting on Urticaria, Urticaria 2008, a joint initiative of the Dermatology Section of the European Academy of Allergology and Clinical Immunology (EAACI), the EU‐funded network of excellence, the Global Allergy and Asthma European Network (GA²LEN), the European Dermatology Forum (EDF) and the World Allergy Organization (WAO). Urticaria is a frequent disease. The life‐time prevalence for any subtype of urticaria is approximately 20%. Chronic spontaneous urticaria and other chronic forms of urticaria do not only cause a decrease in quality of life, but also affect performance at work and school and, as such, are members of the group of severe allergic diseases. This guideline covers the definition and classification of urticaria, taking into account the recent progress in identifying its causes, eliciting factors, and pathomechanisms. In addition, it outlines evidence‐based diagnostic approaches for different subtypes of urticaria. The correct management of urticaria, which is of paramount importance for patients, is very complex and is consequently covered in a separate guideline developed during the same consensus meeting. This guideline was acknowledged and accepted by the European Union of Medical Specialists (UEMS).

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1398-9995.2009.02179.x

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 731

Metadata

Authors
Zuberbier, T., Asero, R., Bindslev‐Jensen, C., Walter Canonica, G., Church, M. K., Giménez‐Arnau, A., Grattan, C. E. H., Kapp, A., Merk, H. F., Rogala, B., Saini, S., Sánchez‐Borges, M., Schmid‐Grendelmeier, P., Schünemann, H., Staubach, P., Vena, G. A., Wedi, B., & Maurer, M.
Venue
Allergy
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2009-09-15
Volume
64
Issue
10
Pages
1417-1426
ISSN
  • 0105-4538 (ISSN-L)
  • 1398-9995
OpenAlex
W2140399799
Cited by
731
References
1
FWCI
49.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: EAACI/GA2LEN/EDF/WAO guideline: definition, classification and diagnosis of urticaria. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1398-9995.2009.02179.x
The paper
Zuberbier, T., Asero, R., Bindslev‐Jensen, C., Walter Canonica, G., Church, M. K., Giménez‐Arnau, A., Grattan, C. E. H., Kapp, A., Merk, H. F., Rogala, B., Saini, S., Sánchez‐Borges, M., Schmid‐Grendelmeier, P., Schünemann, H., Staubach, P., Vena, G. A., Wedi, B., & Maurer, M. (2009). EAACI/GA2LEN/EDF/WAO guideline: definition, classification and diagnosis of urticaria. Allergy. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1398-9995.2009.02179.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.