Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 193

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Rapid identification of important periodontal microorganisms by cultivation

Slots, Jørgen·1986·Oral Microbiology and Immunology

Abstract

Two recent developments have made possible rapid isolation and identification of important periodontal species. Selective media have been designed which demonstrate high recovery efficacy of black‐pigmented Bacteroides spp., Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans, Eikenella corrodens, Fusobacterium spp., Capnocytophaga spp. and other periodontal bacteria. Presumptive tests for identification of periodontal isolates that are rapid and easy have also been described. Available microbiological methods permit even small microbiology laboratories to screen periodontal samples for suspected pathogens.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1399-302x.1986.tb00318.x

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 193

Metadata

Authors
Slots, J.
Venue
Oral Microbiology and Immunology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1986-02
Volume
1
Issue
1
Pages
48-55
ISSN
  • 0902-0055 (ISSN-L)
  • 1399-302X
OpenAlex
W2141075455
Cited by
193
References
0
FWCI
6.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Rapid identification of important periodontal microorganisms by cultivation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1399-302x.1986.tb00318.x
The paper
Slots, J. (1986). Rapid identification of important periodontal microorganisms by cultivation. Oral Microbiology and Immunology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-302x.1986.tb00318.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.