Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 246

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Progress in manipulating ascorbic acid biosynthesis and accumulation in plants

Open access
Ishikawa, Takahiro, Dowdle, John, Smirnoff, Nicholas·2006·Physiologia Plantarum

Abstract

l‐Ascorbic acid (vitamin C) is synthesized from hexose sugars. It is an antioxidant and redox buffer, as well as an enzyme cofactor, so it has multiple roles in metabolism and in plant responses to abiotic stresses and pathogens. Plant‐derived ascorbate also provides the major source of vitamin C in the human diet. An understanding of how ascorbate metabolism is controlled should provide a basis for engineering or otherwise manipulating its accumulation. Biochemical and molecular genetic evidence supports synthesis from GDP‐d‐mannose via l‐galactose (d‐Man/l‐Gal pathway) as a significant source of ascorbate. More recently, evidence for pathways via uronic acids has been obtained: overexpression of myo‐inositol oxygenase, d‐galacturonate reductase and l‐gulono‐1,4‐lactone oxidase all increase leaf ascorbate concentration. Interestingly, this has proved more effective in pathway engineering than overexpressing various d‐Man/l‐Gal pathway genes. Ascorbate oxidation generates the potentially unstable dehydroascorbate, and the overexpression of glutathione‐dependent dehydroascorbate reductase has resulted in increased ascorbate. Ascorbate is catabolized to products such as oxalate, l‐threonate and l‐tartrate. The enzymes involved have not been identified, so catabolism is not yet amenable to manipulation. In the examples of pathway engineering so far, the increase in ascorbate has been modest on an absolute or proportional basis. Therefore, a deeper understanding of ascorbate metabolism is needed to achieve larger increases. Identifying genes that control ascorbate accumulation by techniques such as analysis of quantitative trait loci (QTL) or activation tagging may hold promise, particularly if regulatory genes can be identified.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1399-3054.2006.00640.x

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 246

Metadata

Authors
Ishikawa, T., Dowdle, J., & Smirnoff, N.
Venue
Physiologia Plantarum
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2006-02-24
Volume
126
Issue
3
Pages
343-355
ISSN
  • 0031-9317 (ISSN-L)
  • 1399-3054
OpenAlex
W1987367831
Cited by
246
References
3
FWCI
7.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Progress in manipulating ascorbic acid biosynthesis and accumulation in plants. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1399-3054.2006.00640.x
The paper
Ishikawa, T., Dowdle, J., & Smirnoff, N. (2006). Progress in manipulating ascorbic acid biosynthesis and accumulation in plants. Physiologia Plantarum. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-3054.2006.00640.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.