The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A new optical leaf‐clip meter for simultaneous non‐destructive assessment of leaf chlorophyll and epidermal flavonoids
Open accessAbstract
We have characterized a new commercial chlorophyll (Chl) and flavonoid (Flav) meter called Dualex 4 Scientific (Dx4). We compared this device to two other Chl meters, the SPAD‐502 and the CCM‐200. In addition, Dx4 was compared to the leaf‐clip Dualex 3 that measures only epidermal Flav. Dx4 is factory‐calibrated to provide a linear response to increasing leaf Chl content in units of µg cm –2 , as opposed to both SPAD‐502 and CCM‐200 that have a non‐linear response to leaf Chl content. Our comparative calibration by Chl extraction confirmed these responses. It seems that the linear response of Dx4 derives from the use of 710 nm as the sampling wavelength for transmittance. The major advantage of Dx4 is its simultaneous assessment of Chl and Flav on the same leaf spot. This allows the generation of the nitrogen balance index (NBI) used for crop surveys and nitrogen nutrition management. The Dx4 leaf clip, that incorporates a GPS receiver, can be useful for non‐destructive estimation of leaf Chl and Flav contents for ecophysiological research and ground truthing of remote sensing of vegetation. In this work, we also propose a consensus equation for the transformation of SPAD units into leaf Chl content, for general use.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Uddling, J., Gelang-Alfredsson, J., Piikki, K., & Pleijel, H. (2007) · Photosynthesis Research · doi:10.1007/s11120-006-9077-5 · Cited by 885
Cited by
Xiong, D., Chen, J., Yu, T., Gao, W., Ling, X., Li, Y., Peng, S., & Huang, J. (2015) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep13389 · Cited by 411
Pietrini, F., Passatore, L., Patti, V., Francocci, F., Giovannozzi, A., & Zacchini, M. (2019) · Water · doi:10.3390/w11040808 · Cited by 40
Potential involvement of proline and flavonols in plant responses to ozone
Boublin, F., Cabassa-Hourton, C., Leymarie, J., & Leitao, L. (2022) · Environmental Research · doi:10.1016/j.envres.2021.112214 · Cited by 20
Hartikainen, S. M., & Robson, T. M. (2022) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2022.1058162 · Cited by 10
Metadata
- Authors
- Cerovic, Z. G., Masdoumier, G., Ghozlen, N. B., & Latouche, G.
- Venue
- Physiologia Plantarum
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2012-06-06
- Volume
- 146
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 251-260
- ISSN
- 0031-9317 (ISSN-L)
- 1399-3054
- OpenAlex
- W2129719999
- Cited by
- 550
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 15.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A new optical leaf‐clip meter for simultaneous non‐destructive assessment of leaf chlorophyll and epidermal flavonoids. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1399-3054.2012.01639.x
- The paper
- Cerovic, Z. G., Masdoumier, G., Ghozlen, N. B., & Latouche, G. (2012). A new optical leaf‐clip meter for simultaneous non‐destructive assessment of leaf chlorophyll and epidermal flavonoids. Physiologia Plantarum. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-3054.2012.01639.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.