The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Reduction in the incidence of awareness using BIS monitoring
Abstract
Background: Explicit recall (ER) is evident in approximately 0.2% of patients given general anaesthesia including muscle relaxants. This prospective study was performed to evaluate if cerebral monitoring using BIS to guide the conduction of anaesthesia could reduce this incidence significantly. Patients and methods: A prospective cohort of 4945 consecutive surgical patients requiring muscle relaxants and/or intubation were monitored with BIS and subsequently interviewed for ER on three occasions. BIS values between 40 and 60 were recommended. The results from the BIS‐monitored group of patients was compared with a historical group of 7826 similar cases in a previous study when no cerebral monitoring was used. Results: Two patients in the BIS‐monitored group, 0.04%, had ER as compared with 0.18% in the control group (P < 0.038). Both BIS‐monitored patients with ER were aware during intubation when they had high BIS values (>60) for 4 min and more than 10 min, respectively. However, periods with high BIS = 4 min were also evident in other patients with no ER. Episodes with high BIS, 4 min or more, were found in 19% of the monitored patients during induction, and in 8% of cases during maintenance. Conclusions: The use of BIS monitoring during general anaesthesia requiring endotracheal intubation and/or muscle relaxants was associated with a significantly reduced incidence of awareness as compared with a historical control population.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Myles, P., Leslie, K., McNeil, J., Forbes, A., & Chan, M. (2004) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(04)16300-9 · Cited by 1,301
Update on Bispectral Index monitoring
Johansen, J. W. (2006) · Best Practice & Research Clinical Anaesthesiology · doi:10.1016/j.bpa.2005.08.004 · Cited by 313
The effects of anesthetics on brain activity and cognitive function
Heinke, W., & Koelsch, S. (2005) · Current Opinion in Anaesthesiology · doi:10.1097/01.aco.0000189879.67092.12 · Cited by 116
Current status of EEG-based depth-of-consciousness monitoring during general anesthesia
Musialowicz, T., & Lahtinen, P. (2014) · Current Anesthesiology Reports · doi:10.1007/s40140-014-0061-x · Cited by 33
Metadata
- Authors
- Ekman, A., Lindholm, M., Lennmarken, C., & Sandin, R.
- Venue
- Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2003-12-12
- Volume
- 48
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 20-26
- ISSN
- 0001-5172 (ISSN-L)
- 1399-6576
- OpenAlex
- W2104345723
- Cited by
- 394
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 28.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Reduction in the incidence of awareness using BIS monitoring. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1399-6576.2004.00260.x
- The paper
- Ekman, A., Lindholm, M., Lennmarken, C., & Sandin, R. (2004). Reduction in the incidence of awareness using BIS monitoring. Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-6576.2004.00260.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.