EEG spectral entropy, heart rate, photoplethysmography and motor responses to skin incision during sevoflurane anaesthesia
Abstract
Background: Analgesia is a part of balanced anaesthesia, but direct indicators of nociception do not exist. We examined the relationship between motor reactions and physiological variables during skin incision in sevoflurane anaesthesia and hypothesized that nociception could be detected and graded by significant changes in these variables. Methods: Thirty‐one women scheduled for abdominal hysterectomy participated in the study. Anaesthesia was induced with fentanyl (1 µg kg−1), propofol (1 mg kg−1) and sevoflurane. Skin incision was performed 14 min after induction during 1.6% end‐tidal sevoflurane anaesthesia without neuromuscular blockade. Electrocardiography (ECG), photoplethysmography (PPG) and electroencephalography (EEG) were registered, and a range of variables was computed from these signals. The postincision values, normalized with respect to their preincision values, of movers vs. non‐movers were compared. The variables showing significant differences between movers and non‐movers were used to develop a logistic regression equation for the classification of patients into movers or non‐movers. Results: Twenty‐six patients were eligible for analysis, and 12 (46%) displayed a motor reaction to skin incision (movers). Many ECG, PPG and EEG‐related variables showed significant differences between the pre‐ and postincision periods. The best classification performance, assessed by leave‐one‐out cross‐validation, between movers and non‐movers was achieved with the combination of response entropy of EEG, RR‐interval and PPG notch amplitude. The corresponding equation yielded 96% correct classification with 90% sensitivity and 100% specificity. The classification performance of any single variable alone was considerably worse. Conclusion: Combination of information from different sources may be required for monitoring the adequacy of analgesia during anaesthesia.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Feature matrix input can be extracted by wavelet, entropy, STFT, power spectral density, and so on.
“Another form of input is the feature matrix that could be extracted by wavelet, entropy, STFT, power spectral density, and so on (Subasi, 2007; Filippo et al., 2009; Seitsonen et al., 2010; Lu et al., 2017; Lashgari et al., 2020).”
From Data Augmentation for Deep Neural Networks Model in EEG Classification Task: A Review (2021) · cites this paper as Seitsonen et al., 2010
Cites
What's wrong with Bonferroni adjustments
Perneger, T. V. (1998) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.316.7139.1236 · Cited by 5,900 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
On the Analysis of Fingertip Photoplethysmogram Signals
Elgendi, M. (2012) · Current Cardiology Reviews · doi:10.2174/157340312801215782 · Cited by 1,206 · see citing works
Ghamari, M. (2018) · International Journal of Biosensors & Bioelectronics · doi:10.15406/ijbsbe.2018.04.00125 · Cited by 945 · see citing works
Data Augmentation for Deep Neural Networks Model in EEG Classification Task: A Review
He, C., Liu, J., Zhu, Y., & Du, W. (2021) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2021.765525 · Cited by 105 · see citing works
“Another form of input is the feature matrix that could be extracted by wavelet, entropy, STFT, power spectral density, and so on (Subasi, 2007; Filippo et al., 2009; Seitsonen et al., 2010; Lu et al., 2017; Lashgari et al., 2020).”
BackgroundFeng, Y., Drzymalski, D., Zhao, B., Wang, X., & Chen, X. (2018) · BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth · doi:10.1186/s12884-018-1914-y · Cited by 9 · see citing works
- Authors
- Seitsonen, E. R. J., Korhonen, I. K. J., Van Gils, M. J., Huiku, M., Lötjönen, J. M. P., Korttila, K. T., & Yli‐Hankala, A. M.
- Affiliations
- Helsinki University Hospital (FI)
- VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland (FI)
- Tampere University Hospital (FI)
- Corresponding author
- Seitsonen, E. R. J.
- Venue
- Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2005-03
- Volume
- 49
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 284-292
- ISSN
- 0001-5172 (ISSN-L)
- 1399-6576
- OpenAlex
- W2096993177
- Cited by
- 120
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 7
- FWCI
- 6.99
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Anesthesia and Sedative Agents
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Anesthesia and Pain Management
- Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Veterinary Pharmacology and Anesthesia
- Keywords
- sevoflurane anesthesia, skin incision, nociception, analgesia adequacy, photoplethysmography, heart rate, motor response, abdominal hysterectomy, nociception monitoring, RR interval
- MeSH terms
- Sevoflurane, Adult, Electrocardiography, Electroencephalography, Female, Heart Rate, Humans, Hysterectomy, Methyl Ethers, Middle Aged, Movement, Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted, Time Factors, Monitoring, Intraoperative, Photoplethysmography, Anesthetics, Inhalation, Statistics, Nonparametric, Dermatologic Surgical Procedures
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review