Cited by 1,322Patient Safety and Medication ErrorsTeam Dynamics and PerformanceInterprofessional Education and Collaboration

Teamwork and patient safety in dynamic domains of healthcare: A review of the literature

MANSER, T.·2009·Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica

Abstract

Aims/background This review examines current research on teamwork in highly dynamic domains of healthcare such as operating rooms, intensive care, emergency medicine, or trauma and resuscitation teams with a focus on aspects relevant to the quality and safety of patient care. Results Evidence from three main areas of research supports the relationship between teamwork and patient safety: (1) Studies investigating the factors contributing to critical incidents and adverse events have shown that teamwork plays an important role in the causation and prevention of adverse events. (2) Research focusing on healthcare providers' perceptions of teamwork demonstrated that (a) staff's perceptions of teamwork and attitudes toward safety-relevant team behavior were related to the quality and safety of patient care and (b) perceptions of teamwork and leadership style are associated with staff well-being, which may impact clinician' ability to provide safe patient care. (3) Observational studies on teamwork behaviors related to high clinical performance have identified patterns of communication, coordination, and leadership that support effective teamwork. Conclusion In recent years, research using diverse methodological approaches has led to significant progress in team research in healthcare. The challenge for future research is to further develop and validate instruments for team performance assessment and to develop sound theoretical models of team performance in dynamic medical domain…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2008.01717.x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Breakdowns in teamwork, manifesting as low cohesion or unmanaged interpersonal conflict, are linked to higher error rates, poorer patient satisfaction, and greater nurse turnover.

    “Breakdowns in teamwork-manifesting as low cohesion or unmanaged interpersonal conflict-have been linked to higher error rates, poorer patient satisfaction, and greater nurse turnover (Manser, 2009;West et al., 2020).”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
MANSER, T.
Affiliations
ETH Zurich (CH)
Corresponding author
MANSER, T.
Venue
Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2009-01-19
Volume
53
Issue
2
Pages
143-151
ISSN
  • 0001-5172 (ISSN-L)
  • 1399-6576
OpenAlex
W1642310120
Cited by
1,322
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 94 · 2025: 55 · 2024: 71 · 2023: 85 · 2022: 89 · 2021: 92 · 2020: 113 · 2019: 91 · 2018: 76 · 2017: 84 · 2016: 87 · 2015: 75 · 2014: 78 · 2013: 82 · 2012: 54
FWCI
11.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Emergency Medical Services › Patient Safety and Medication Errors
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Team Dynamics and Performance
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Interprofessional Education and Collaboration
Keywords
teamwork, patient safety, adverse events, critical incidents, surgical workforce, leadership styles, employee perceptions, team communication, team coordination, employee well-being, team performance evaluation, team training
MeSH terms
Attitude of Health Personnel, Communication Barriers, Cooperative Behavior, Emergency Service, Hospital, Goals, Group Processes, Humans, Intensive Care Units, Leadership, Operating Rooms, Patient Care Team, Resuscitation, Safety, Medical Errors, Interdisciplinary Communication

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review