The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Combining probability from independent tests: the weighted Z ‐method is superior to Fisher's approach
Abstract
The most commonly used method in evolutionary biology for combining information across multiple tests of the same null hypothesis is Fisher's combined probability test. This note shows that an alternative method called the weighted Z ‐test has more power and more precision than does Fisher's test. Furthermore, in contrast to some statements in the literature, the weighted Z‐ method is superior to the unweighted Z ‐transform approach. The results in this note show that, when combining P ‐values from multiple tests of the same hypothesis, the weighted Z ‐method should be preferred.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Analyzing Tables of Statistical Tests
Rice, W. R. (1989) · Evolution · doi:10.2307/2409177 · Cited by 14,571
meta-analysis bias in location and selection of studies
Egger, M., & Smith, G. D. (1998) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.316.7124.61 · Cited by 1,374
Cited by
Visscher, P. M., Brown, M. A., McCarthy, M. I., & Yang, J. (2012) · The American Journal of Human Genetics · doi:10.1016/j.ajhg.2011.11.029 · Cited by 2,425
Systematic identification of trans eQTLs as putative drivers of known disease associations
Westra, H.-J., Peters, M. J., Esko, T., Yaghootkar, H., Schurmann, C., Kettunen, J., Christiansen, M. W., Fairfax, B. P., Schramm, K., Powell, J. E., et al. (2013) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng.2756 · Cited by 1,658
Phenotype molding of stromal cells in the lung tumor microenvironment
Lambrechts, D., Wauters, E., Boeckx, B., Aibar, S., Nittner, D., Burton, O., Bassez, A., Decaluwé, H., Pircher, A., Van den Eynde, K., et al. (2018) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41591-018-0096-5 · Cited by 1,648
MAGIC, Heid, I. M., Jackson, A. U., Randall, J. C., Winkler, T. W., Qi, L., Steinthorsdottir, V., Thorleifsson, G., Zillikens, M. C., Speliotes, E. K., et al. (2010) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng.685 · Cited by 931
Blount, Z. D., Borland, C. Z., & Lenski, R. E. (2008) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0803151105 · Cited by 840
Metadata
- Authors
- WHITLOCK, M. C.
- Venue
- Journal of Evolutionary Biology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2005-08-25
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1368-1373
- ISSN
- 1010-061X (ISSN-L)
- 1420-9101
- OpenAlex
- W1587447328
- Cited by
- 752
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 18.80
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
