The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Heritability and fitness-related consequences of squid personality traits
Open accessAbstract
Dumpling squid, Euprymna tasmanica, show consistent individual differences in behaviour that can be classified according to indices reflecting shy–bold, activity and reactivity responses. Using crosses of wild-caught single males to multiple females with known behavioural phenotypes, this study estimated patterns of additive genetic and residual variance in these behavioural traits from offspring of squid in two contexts, a threat (antipredator) and feeding (foraging) test. Genetic contributions to behavioural expression were dependent on test context. Behaviours in antipredator contexts had significant heritabilities (h2 = 0.2–0.8) while behaviours from foraging contexts had lesser additive genetic and greater residual components (h2 = 0.05–0.08). Personality trait variation in females was not related to her fecundity. Female boldness in foraging situations, which co-varied with body size, explained small but significant variation (∼21%) in brood hatching success, while successful fertilization was determined by positive assortion of mate pairs according to their shy–bold phenotype. These results are discussed in terms of the ecological and evolutionary significance of animal ‘personality’ traits in wild populations of animals.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Fear and Fearfulness in Animals
Boissy, A. (1995) · The Quarterly Review of Biology · doi:10.1086/418981 · Cited by 747
Fleeson, W. (2004) · Current Directions in Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.0963-7214.2004.00280.x · Cited by 649
Cephalopod populations: definition and dynamics
Boyle, P. R., & Boletzky, S. V. (1996) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.1996.0089 · Cited by 220
Cited by
Integrating animal temperament within ecology and evolution
Réale, D., Reader, S. M., Sol, D., McDougall, P. T., & Dingemanse, N. J. (2007) · Biological Reviews · doi:10.1111/j.1469-185x.2007.00010.x · Cited by 3,132
Life-history trade-offs favour the evolution of animal personalities
Wolf, M., van Doorn, G. S., Leimar, O., & Weissing, F. J. (2007) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature05835 · Cited by 1,427
Individual dispersal, landscape connectivity and ecological networks
Baguette, M., Blanchet, S., Legrand, D., Stevens, V. M., & Turlure, C. (2013) · Biological Reviews · doi:10.1111/brv.12000 · Cited by 714
Does it always pay to defend one's nest? A case study in African penguin
Traisnel, G., & Pichegru, L. (2018) · Ethology · doi:10.1111/eth.12704 · Cited by 31
Metadata
- Authors
- Sinn, D. L., Apiolaza, L. A., & Moltschaniwskyj, N. A.
- Venue
- Journal of Evolutionary Biology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2006-09-01
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1437-1447
- ISSN
- 1010-061X (ISSN-L)
- 1420-9101
- OpenAlex
- W2129761711
- Cited by
- 191
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 8.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Heritability and fitness-related consequences of squid personality traits. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1420-9101.2006.01136.x
- The paper
- Sinn, D. L., Apiolaza, L. A., & Moltschaniwskyj, N. A. (2006). Heritability and fitness-related consequences of squid personality traits. Journal of Evolutionary Biology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1420-9101.2006.01136.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.