CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 714

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Individual dispersal, landscape connectivity and ecological networks

Baguette, Michel, Blanchet, Simon, Legrand, Delphine, Stevens, Virginie M., Turlure, Camille·2013·Biological Reviews
DOI 10.1111/brv.12000
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Connectivity is classically considered an emergent property of landscapes encapsulating individuals' flows across space. However, its operational use requires a precise understanding of why and how organisms disperse. Such movements, and hence landscape connectivity, will obviously vary according to both organism properties and landscape features. We review whether landscape connectivity estimates could gain in both precision and generality by incorporating three fundamental outcomes of dispersal theory. Firstly, dispersal is a multi‐causal process; its restriction to an ‘escape reaction’ to environmental unsuitability is an oversimplification, as dispersing individuals can leave excellent quality habitat patches or stay in poor‐quality habitats according to the relative costs and benefits of dispersal and philopatry. Secondly, species, populations and individuals do not always react similarly to those cues that trigger dispersal, which sometimes results in contrasting dispersal strategies. Finally, dispersal is a major component of fitness and is thus under strong selective pressures, which could generate rapid adaptations of dispersal strategies. Such evolutionary responses will entail spatiotemporal variation in landscape connectivity. We thus strongly recommend the use of genetic tools to: ( i ) assess gene flow intensity and direction among populations in a given landscape; and ( ii ) accurately estimate landscape features impacting gene flow, and hence landscape connectivity. Such approaches will provide the basic data for planning corridors or stepping stones aiming at (re)connecting local populations of a given species in a given landscape. This strategy is clearly species‐ and landscape‐specific. But we suggest that the ecological network in a given landscape could be designed by stacking up such linkages designed for several species living in different ecosystems. This procedure relies on the use of umbrella species that are representative of other species living in the same ecosystem.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/brv.12000

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Landscape connectivity is a function of both structural and functional connectivity, as it depends primarily on movement patterns that are strongly connected to terrain permeability and the composition of available resource patches.

    “Landscape connectivity is a function of both, as it depends primarily on movement patterns that are strongly connected to terrain permeability and the composition of available resource patches (Fig. 1).”

    From From landscape affordances to landscape connectivity: contextualizing an archaeology of human ecology (2020) · cites this paper as Baguette et al. 2013

  • Landscape connectivity defines the degree to which a given landscape enables movement among these patches.

    “Hence, landscape connectivity defines the degree to which a given landscape enables movement among these patches (Baguette et al. 2013; Kupfer 1995; Taylor et al. 1993; Tischendorf and Fahrig 2000b).”

    From From landscape affordances to landscape connectivity: contextualizing an archaeology of human ecology (2020) · cites this paper as Baguette et al. 2013

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 202

  1. 10.1016/S0169-2046(02)00242-6 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1007/s10980-012-9704-9 · DOI
  3. Allag‐Dhuisme F., 2010, Choix Stratégiques de Nature à Contribuer à la Préservation et à la Remise en Bon état des Continuités Ecologiques – Premier Document en Appui à la Mise en Œuvre de la Trame verte et Bleue en France. Proposition Issue du Comité Opérationnel Trame Verte et Bleue
  4. Allen T. F. H., 1998, Ecological Scale. Theory and Applications
  5. 10.1086/524952 · DOI
  6. 10.1111/j.1365-2427.2012.02758.x · DOI
  7. 10.1111/j.1600-0587.2010.06212.x · DOI
  8. 10.1046/j.1365-2664.2000.00478.x · DOI
  9. 10.1007/s10980-007-9108-4 · DOI
  10. Baker R. R., 1978, The Evolutionary Ecology of Animal Migration
  11. Ball I. R., 2009, Spatial Conservation Prioritization: Quantitative Methods and Computational Tools
  12. 10.1186/1471-2148-8-248 · DOI
  13. 10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-102209-144621 · DOI
  14. 10.1101/gr.6409707 · DOI
  15. 10.1534/genetics.109.112532 · DOI
  16. 10.1111/j.1523-1739.1998.98036.x · DOI · Paper page
  17. 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2011.01716.x · DOI · Paper page
  18. Beissinger S. R., 2002, Population Viability Analyses
  19. Bennett A. F., 1999, Linkages in the Landscape: The Role of Corridors and Connectivity in Wildlife Conservation
  20. 10.1111/j.1752-4571.2009.00110.x · DOI
  21. 10.2307/2844972 · DOI
  22. 10.1111/j.1469-185X.2011.00201.x · DOI
  23. 10.1046/j.1365-2656.1999.00363.x · DOI
  24. 10.1017/S1464793104006645 · DOI
  25. 10.5751/ES-00387-060116 · DOI
  26. 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.110308.120324 · DOI
  27. 10.1007/s10980-005-5956-y · DOI
  28. 10.2307/1935620 · DOI
  29. 10.1086/286082 · DOI
  30. 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2010.01505.x · DOI
  31. 10.1890/1540-9295(2004)002[0529:ACGTCM]2.0.CO;2 · DOI · Paper page
  32. 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2006.01007.x · DOI
  33. 10.1073/pnas.1000266107 · DOI
  34. 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2005.00251.x · DOI
  35. 10.1046/j.1523-1739.1999.98338.x · DOI
  36. 10.1073/pnas.1119651109 · DOI
  37. 10.1126/science.1069349 · DOI · Paper page
  38. 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2011.01648.x · DOI
  39. 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.37.091305.110050 · DOI
  40. 10.2989/18142320309504040 · DOI
  41. Clobert J., 2008, Behavioural Ecology
  42. 10.1016/B978-012323448-3/50015-5 · DOI
  43. 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2008.01267.x · DOI · Paper page
  44. 10.1073/pnas.0908057107 · DOI
  45. 10.1098/rstb.2010.0176 · DOI
  46. 10.1046/j.1365-2427.2003.01050.x · DOI
  47. 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2004.02253.x · DOI
  48. 10.1126/science.1122039 · DOI · Paper page
  49. 10.1017/CBO9780511754821 · DOI
  50. 10.1086/506976 · DOI · Paper page
  51. 10.1111/j.0906-7590.2005.04018.x · DOI
  52. 10.1111/j.1600-0706.2010.18615.x · DOI
  53. 10.1034/j.1600-0579.2003.12492.x · DOI
  54. 10.1007/s10980-010-9532-8 · DOI
  55. DiBacco C., 2006, Connectivity Conservation
  56. 10.1016/j.tree.2009.07.013 · DOI
  57. 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2010.01899.x · DOI
  58. 10.1071/MU09118 · DOI
  59. 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2012.01704.x · DOI
  60. 10.1017/S1464793105006950 · DOI · Paper page
  61. 10.1098/rspb.2008.1535 · DOI
  62. 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2008.00459.x · DOI
  63. 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2010.04678.x · DOI
  64. 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2007.01325.x · DOI
  65. 10.1017/S1464793105006949 · DOI · Paper page
  66. 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2005.00845.x · DOI
  67. 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.34.011802.132419 · DOI · Paper page
  68. 10.1534/genetics.107.082560 · DOI
  69. 10.1111/j.1752-4571.2011.00183.x · DOI
  70. 10.1086/427092 · DOI
  71. 10.1017/S1464793105006950 · DOI · Paper page
  72. Forman R. T. T., 1995, Land Mosaic. The Ecology of Landscapes and Region, 10.1017/9781107050327 · DOI · Paper page
  73. Forman R. T. T., 1986, Landscape Ecology
  74. 10.1098/rspb.2005.3448 · DOI
  75. 10.1007/BF01601953 · DOI · Paper page
  76. 10.1007/s11284-009-0684-4 · DOI
  77. 10.1073/pnas.0906473107 · DOI
  78. 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2010.01450.x · DOI
  79. Gilpin M., 1986, Conservation Biology. The Science of Scarcity and Diversity, 19
  80. Gotelli N. J., 1999, Testing macroecology models with stream‐fish assemblages, Evolutionary Ecology Research, 1, 847
  81. 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2008.01426.x · DOI
  82. Hall L. S., 1997, The habitat concept and a plea for a standard terminology, Wildlife Society Bulletin, 25, 173
  83. 10.1534/genetics.105.054296 · DOI
  84. 10.1038/23876 · DOI
  85. 10.2307/3546736 · DOI
  86. Hanski I., 1999, Metapopulation Ecology, 10.1093/oso/9780198540663.001.0001 · DOI
  87. 10.1111/j.1095-8312.1991.tb00548.x · DOI
  88. Hanski I., 1997, Metapopulation Biology, Ecology, Genetics, and Evolution
  89. Hanski I., 1997, Metapopulation Biology. Ecology, Genetics, and Evolution
  90. 10.1534/genetics.103.024182 · DOI
  91. 10.1073/pnas.0611164104 · DOI
  92. Hilty J., 2006, Corridor Ecology. The Science and Practice of Linking Landscapes for Biodiversity Conservation
  93. 10.3354/meps09093 · DOI
  94. 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2010.01919.x · DOI
  95. 10.1111/j.1755-263X.2011.00177.x · DOI
  96. Holt R. D., 2001, Dispersal, 83, 10.1093/oso/9780198506607.003.0006 · DOI
  97. 10.1016/B978-012323445-2/50015-8 · DOI
  98. 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2010.04966.x · DOI
  99. 10.1046/j.1365-294X.2003.02013.x · DOI
  100. 10.1017/CBO9780511606762 · DOI
  101. 10.1086/341519 · DOI
  102. 10.1086/303350 · DOI
  103. 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.38.091206.095702 · DOI
  104. 10.1126/science.1128566 · DOI
  105. 10.1016/j.ress.2005.11.018 · DOI
  106. 10.1007/s10592-007-9372-5 · DOI
  107. 10.1046/j.1523-1739.1997.96319.x · DOI
  108. 10.1890/1540-9295(2006)4[473:CSAYRC]2.0.CO;2 · DOI
  109. 10.1038/nmeth.2104 · DOI
  110. 10.1186/1471-2156-12-31 · DOI
  111. 10.1007/s10709-011-9595-8 · DOI
  112. 10.1534/genetics.108.092080 · DOI
  113. 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2008.01761.x · DOI
  114. 10.1093/besa/15.3.237 · DOI
  115. 10.1098/rsbl.2009.0969 · DOI
  116. 10.1038/46941 · DOI
  117. 10.1016/j.tree.2004.12.004 · DOI
  118. 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2010.04717.x · DOI
  119. 10.1016/S0169-5347(03)00008-9 · DOI · Paper page
  120. 10.1016/j.tree.2011.05.007 · DOI
  121. 10.1111/j.0906-7590.2005.04073.x · DOI
  122. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199608898.003.0001 · DOI
  123. Maynard Smith J., 1989, Evolutionary Genetics
  124. 10.1073/pnas.0909335107 · DOI
  125. 10.1086/285453 · DOI
  126. 10.1046/j.1365-294X.2001.01340.x · DOI
  127. 10.1016/j.biocon.2006.09.008 · DOI
  128. 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2011.02062.x · DOI · Paper page
  129. 10.1890/0012-9658(2002)083[1131:SCMISE]2.0.CO;2 · DOI · Paper page
  130. 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2011.05176.x · DOI
  131. 10.1111/j.0030-1299.2004.12895.x · DOI
  132. 10.1111/j.0030-1299.2004.12894.x · DOI
  133. Morris W. F., 2002, Quantitative Conservation Biology
  134. 10.1086/648311 · DOI
  135. 10.1111/j.0030-1299.2008.16291.x · DOI · Paper page
  136. 10.1073/pnas.0800375105 · DOI
  137. 10.2307/3544818 · DOI
  138. 10.1111/j.2041-210X.2010.00073.x · DOI
  139. 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2009.01597.x · DOI
  140. 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2009.04112.x · DOI
  141. 10.1126/science.1196624 · DOI · Paper page
  142. Pickett S. T. A., 1985, The Ecology of Natural Disturbances and Patch Dynamics
  143. 10.1073/pnas.90.22.10871 · DOI
  144. 10.1038/35002708 · DOI
  145. 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2002.tb00134.x · DOI
  146. 10.1093/jhered/esh074 · DOI
  147. 10.1111/j.1365-2427.2008.02100.x · DOI
  148. 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2004.02396.x · DOI
  149. 10.1016/j.cub.2005.02.038 · DOI
  150. 10.1016/j.cub.2005.04.050 · DOI
  151. 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2009.01652.x · DOI
  152. 10.1006/anbe.2000.1530 · DOI
  153. 10.1111/j.1469-1795.2010.00353.x · DOI
  154. 10.1016/S0006-3207(02)00158-1 · DOI
  155. 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.38.091206.095611 · DOI
  156. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199608898.003.0010 · DOI
  157. 10.1046/j.1523-1739.2002.01085.x · DOI
  158. 10.1038/33136 · DOI
  159. 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2011.01970.x · DOI
  160. 10.1186/1471-2148-7-4 · DOI
  161. 10.1890/0012-9658(2006)87[1057:DDWHFI]2.0.CO;2 · DOI
  162. 10.1007/978-4-431-87771-4_9 · DOI
  163. 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2010.04745.x · DOI · Paper page
  164. 10.1046/j.1523-1739.1992.06040493.x · DOI
  165. 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2006.01136.x · DOI
  166. 10.1126/science.3576198 · DOI
  167. 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2010.04786.x · DOI
  168. 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2008.03952.x · DOI
  169. Stamps J. A., 2001, Dispersal
  170. 10.1007/978-94-011-2338-9 · DOI
  171. 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2008.00990.x · DOI
  172. 10.1371/journal.pone.0011123 · DOI
  173. 10.1111/j.1469-185X.2009.00119.x · DOI
  174. 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2011.01709.x · DOI
  175. 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2006.02936.x · DOI
  176. 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2010.04691.x · DOI
  177. 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2010.01892.x · DOI
  178. 10.1016/S0169-5347(00)01825-5 · DOI
  179. 10.1111/j.1469-185X.2009.00093.x · DOI
  180. 10.2307/3544927 · DOI · Paper page
  181. 10.1017/CBO9780511754821.003 · DOI
  182. 10.1007/s00227-010-1471-z · DOI
  183. 10.1098/rspb.1999.0696 · DOI
  184. 10.1098/rspb.1999.0854 · DOI
  185. 10.1890/09-2015.1 · DOI
  186. 10.1093/beheco/arr077 · DOI
  187. 10.1111/j.1600-0706.2009.17269.x · DOI
  188. 10.1890/10-0097.1 · DOI
  189. 10.1890/0012-9658(2001)082[1205:LCAGTP]2.0.CO;2 · DOI
  190. 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2008.01271.x · DOI · Paper page
  191. 10.1111/j.0906-7590.2008.05442.x · DOI
  192. 10.1023/B:LAND.0000014492.50765.05 · DOI · Paper page
  193. 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2005.02568.x · DOI
  194. 10.1126/science.277.5325.494 · DOI · Paper page
  195. 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2010.04715.x · DOI
  196. Wang Y.‐H., 2008, Habitat suitability modelling to correlate gene flow with landscape connectivity, Landscape Ecology, 23, 989
  197. 10.1007/s10682-007-9183-7 · DOI
  198. Whitlock M. C., 1999, Indirect measures of gene flow and migration: Fst doesn't equal 1/(4Nm+1), Heredity, 82, 117, 10.1038/sj.hdy.6884960 · DOI
  199. Wiens J. A., 1997, Metapopulation Biology. Ecology, Genetics, and Evolution
  200. 10.1016/0169-5347(94)90134-1 · DOI

200 of 202 shown

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Baguette, M., Blanchet, S., Legrand, D., Stevens, V. M., & Turlure, C.
Venue
Biological Reviews
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2012-11-24
Volume
88
Issue
2
Pages
310-326
ISSN
  • 1464-7931
  • 1469-185X
DOI
10.1111/brv.12000
Cited by
714
References
5
Language
en
Licence
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor (vor)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review