Comparative anatomy and phylogenetic distribution of the mammalian cecal appendix
Abstract
A recently improved understanding of gut immunity has merged with current thinking in biological and medical science, pointing to an apparent function of the mammalian cecal appendix as a safe-house for symbiotic gut microbes, preserving the flora during times of gastrointestinal infection in societies without modern medicine. This function is potentially a selective force for the evolution and maintenance of the appendix, and provides an impetus for reassessment of the evolution of the appendix. A comparative anatomical approach reveals three apparent morphotypes of the cecal appendix, as well as appendix-like structures in some species that lack a true cecal appendix. Cladistic analyses indicate that the appendix has evolved independently at least twice (at least once in diprotodont marsupials and at least once in Euarchontoglires), shows a highly significant (P < 0.0001) phylogenetic signal in its distribution, and has been maintained in mammalian evolution for 80 million years or longer.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The appendix in mammals is mentioned in humans, lagomorphs and some rodents sharing the same ontogenetic origin and high lymphoid concentration.
“The appendix in mammals is mentioned in humans, lagomorphs and some rodents sharing the same ontogenetic origin and high lymphoid concentration (Smith et al., 2009).”
From Anatomical Particularities of the Cecum in Rabbits and Chinchillas (2014) · cites this paper as Smith et al., 2009
The immunologic function is supported by immune molecules such as IgA and mucin which support growth of bacterial biofilms on the epithelium of the proximal colon both in humans and in rabbits.
“The immunologic function is supported by immune molecules such as IgA and mucin which support growth of bacterial bio ilms on the epithelium of the proximal colon both in humans and in rabbits (Smith et al., 2009).”
From Anatomical Particularities of the Cecum in Rabbits and Chinchillas (2014) · cites this paper as Smith et al., 2009
Cites
Host-Bacterial Mutualism in the Human Intestine
Bäckhed, F., Ley, R. E., Sonnenburg, J. L., Peterson, D. A., & Gordon, J. I. (2005) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1104816 · Cited by 5,277 · see citing works
The delayed rise of present-day mammals
Bininda-Emonds, O. R. P., Cardillo, M., Jones, K. E., MacPhee, R. D. E., Beck, R. M. D., Grenyer, R., Price, S. A., Vos, R. A., Gittleman, J. L., & Purvis, A. (2007) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature05634 · Cited by 2,082 · see citing works
Swidsinski, A. (2005) · World Journal of Gastroenterology · doi:10.3748/wjg.v11.i8.1131 · Cited by 314 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Gut biogeography of the bacterial microbiota
Donaldson, G. P., Lee, S. M., & Mazmanian, S. K. (2016) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nrmicro3552 · Cited by 2,535 · see citing works
Complementarity and redundancy of IL-22-producing innate lymphoid cells
Rankin, L. C., Girard-Madoux, M. J. H., Seillet, C., Mielke, L. A., Kerdiles, Y., Fenis, A., Wieduwild, E., Putoczki, T., Mondot, S., Lantz, O., et al. (2016) · Nature Immunology · doi:10.1038/ni.3332 · Cited by 249 · see citing works
Anatomical Particularities of the Cecum in Rabbits and Chinchillas
STAN, F. G. (2014) · Bulletin of University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine Cluj-Napoca. Veterinary Medicine · doi:10.15835/buasvmcn-vm:10587 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
“The appendix in mammals is mentioned in humans, lagomorphs and some rodents sharing the same ontogenetic origin and high lymphoid concentration (Smith et al., 2009).”
Background
- Authors
- SMITH, H. F., FISHER, R. E., EVERETT, M. L., THOMAS, A. D., RANDAL BOLLINGER, R., & PARKER, W.
- Affiliations
- Midwestern University (US)
- University of Arizona College of Medicine- Phoenix (US)
- Duke Medical Center (US)
- Venue
- Journal of Evolutionary Biology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2009-09-14
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 1984-1999
- ISSN
- 1010-061X (ISSN-L)
- 1420-9101
- OpenAlex
- W2100064276
- Cited by
- 138
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 9 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 5.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Evolutionary Biology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health
- National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (R01 HL 60232-03, R01HL060232)
- National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (P30DK034987)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Urology › Comparative Animal Anatomy Studies
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Evolution and Paleontology Studies
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gut microbiota and health
- Keywords
- cecal appendix, intestinal immunity, gut microbiota, microbial symbionts, gastrointestinal infections, comparative anatomy, morphotypes, marsupials, Euarchontoglires, convergent evolution, phylogenetic signal, cladistic analysis
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Cecum, Mammals, Phylogeny
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review