The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Insect Immunity: Isolation and Structure of Cecropin D and Four Minor Antibacterial Components from Cecropia Pupae
Abstract
We have investigated low molecular weight antibacterial proteins from the Cecropia moth. Hyalophora cecropia. In addition to the previously described cecropins A and B, five new antibacterial proteins were discovered, the cecropins C, D, E and F, and the factor G. A scheme for the purification of these factors is presented. Cecropin D is a major cecropin, its amino acid sequence, WNPFKELEKVGQRVRDAVISAGPAVATVAQATALAK, shows homology to cecropin A and B. Like these cecropins, cecropin D has a block C-terminal. The previously tentative C-terminal sequence of cecropin A is also confirmed. It is concluded that the three major cecropins, A, B and D, are products of three different genes that are derived from a common ancestor. The cecropins C, E and F were present in very low amounts, and thus their primary structures could not be fully elucidated. Cecropin C has an amino acid sequence that up to residue 37 is identical to the sequence of A, though it lacks the C-terminal blocking group. It may be a precursor or degradation product of cecropin A. The minor cecropin E shows a similar relation to cecropin D. Cecropin F has a single amino acid replacement (17 Asp leads to Asn) compared to cecropin D, and is probably a product of an allele that is present at a low frequency in the population. The primary structure of the factor G could not be determined, however its amino acid composition is different from that of the cecropins. All the major cecropins were found to be efficient against several gram-positive and gram-negative bacterial strains. No significant difference was found between them in their activity against Escherichia coli, though against some less susceptible bacteria the most basic cecropins were more effective, the activity falling in the series B greater than A much greater than D.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Detergent-like actions of linear amphipathic cationic antimicrobial peptides
Bechinger, B., & Lohner, K. (2006) · Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Biomembranes · doi:10.1016/j.bbamem.2006.07.001 · Cited by 593
Sato, H., & Feix, J. B. (2006) · Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Biomembranes · doi:10.1016/j.bbamem.2006.02.021 · Cited by 522
Bechinger, B. (1999) · Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Biomembranes · doi:10.1016/s0005-2736(99)00205-9 · Cited by 498
A Scavenger Function for a DrosophilaPeptidoglycan Recognition Protein
Mellroth, P., Karlsson, J., & Steiner, H. (2003) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.m208900200 · Cited by 342
Antimicrobial Peptides: An Update on Classifications and Databases
Bin Hafeez, A., Jiang, X., Bergen, P. J., & Zhu, Y. (2021) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms222111691 · Cited by 341
Metadata
- Authors
- HULTMARK, D., ENGSTROM, A., BENNICH, H., KAPUR, R., & BOMAN, H. G.
- Venue
- European Journal of Biochemistry
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1982-09
- Volume
- 127
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 207-217
- ISSN
- 0014-2956 (ISSN-L)
- 1432-1033
- OpenAlex
- W2073805517
- Cited by
- 429
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 10.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Insect Immunity: Isolation and Structure of Cecropin D and Four Minor Antibacterial Components from Cecropia Pupae. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1432-1033.1982.tb06857.x
- The paper
- HULTMARK, D., ENGSTROM, A., BENNICH, H., KAPUR, R., & BOMAN, H. G. (1982). Insect Immunity: Isolation and Structure of Cecropin D and Four Minor Antibacterial Components from Cecropia Pupae. European Journal of Biochemistry. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1432-1033.1982.tb06857.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.