The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Purification and properties of a recombinant sulfur analog of murine selenium‐glutathione peroxidase
Abstract
We previously constructed plasmids for synthesis of glutathione‐peroxidase (GPx) mutants in an Escherichia coli expression system. In these recombinant proteins either cysteine ([Cys]GPx mutant) or serine ([Ser]GPx mutant) were present in place of the active‐site selenocysteine (SeCys) of the natural enzyme. We have now investigated GPx activity of [CysIGPx and [SerIGPx mutants. Enzyme assays performed on preparations of these partially purified proteins demonstrated that the [CysIGPx mutant exhibited a significant GPx activity, unlike the [SerIGPx mutant. Purification of [Cys]GPx was performed in two steps of ion‐exchange chromatography giving a 98% homogenous protein in 50% yield. The purified [Cys]GPx protein was shown to be a symmetrical tetramer by the means of gel‐filtration HPLC and SDS/PAGE. Two isoelectric points were found (6.8 and 7.2) which may reflect two different oxidation states of the mutant protein. The GPx activity of the [Cys]GPx mutant was optimal at pH 8.5. The [Cys]GPx mutant had a specific activity approximately 1000‐fold smaller than that of the natural enzyme, and was very easily inactivated by hydroperoxides. Inhibition of the activity with iodoacetate determined a p Ka, of 8.3, presumably that of the active‐site cysteine. Unlike that of SeGPx, the GPx activity of [Cys]GPx was only slightly inhibited by mercaptosuccinate. We discuss hypothetical mechanistic constraints of either catalytic cycle, which may explain such results.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Glutathione Peroxidase, V. The kinetic mechanism
Flohé, L., Loschen, G., Günzler, W. A., & Eichele, E. (1972) · Hoppe-Seyler´s Zeitschrift für physiologische Chemie · doi:10.1515/bchm2.1972.353.1.987 · Cited by 340
Cited by
Lubos, E., Loscalzo, J., & Handy, D. E. (2011) · Antioxidants & Redox Signaling · doi:10.1089/ars.2010.3586 · Cited by 1,280
Reich, H. J., & Hondal, R. J. (2016) · ACS Chemical Biology · doi:10.1021/acschembio.6b00031 · Cited by 923
Intracellular Antioxidants: from Chemical to Biochemical Mechanisms
Chaudière, J., & Ferrari-Iliou, R. (1999) · Food and Chemical Toxicology · doi:10.1016/s0278-6915(99)00090-3 · Cited by 671
Self-citationTrends in selenium biochemistry
Birringer, M., Pilawa, S., & Flohé, L. (2002) · Nat. Prod. Rep. · doi:10.1039/b205802m · Cited by 440
Catalytic mechanisms and specificities of glutathione peroxidases: variations of a basic scheme
Toppo, S., Flohé, L., Ursini, F., Vanin, S., & Maiorino, M. (2009) · Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - General Subjects · doi:10.1016/j.bbagen.2009.04.007 · Cited by 368
Metadata
- Authors
- ROCHER, C., LALANNE, J., & CHAUDIÈRE, J.
- Venue
- European Journal of Biochemistry
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1992-05
- Volume
- 205
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 955-960
- ISSN
- 0014-2956 (ISSN-L)
- 1432-1033
- OpenAlex
- W2036954969
- Cited by
- 172
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 1.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Purification and properties of a recombinant sulfur analog of murine selenium‐glutathione peroxidase. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1432-1033.1992.tb16862.x
- The paper
- ROCHER, C., LALANNE, J., & CHAUDIÈRE, J. (1992). Purification and properties of a recombinant sulfur analog of murine selenium‐glutathione peroxidase. European Journal of Biochemistry. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1432-1033.1992.tb16862.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.