The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Biosynthesis and Biological Activities of Lantibiotics with Unique Post‐Translational Modifications
Abstract
Lantibiotics are biologically active peptides which contain the thioether amino acid lanthionine as well as several other modified amino acids. They can be broadly divided into two groups on the basis of their structures: type‐A lantibiotics are elongated, amphiphilic peptides, while type‐B lantibiotics are compact and globular. In the last decade there has been a marked increase in research interest in these peptides due both to the novel biosynthetic mechanisms by which they are produced, as well as to their potential applications. Lantibiotics are synthesised on the ribosome as a prepeptide which undergoes several post‐translational modification events, including dehydration of specific hydroxyl amino acids to form dehydroamino acids, addition of neighbouring sulfhydryl groups to form thioethers and, in specific cases, other modifications such as introduction of d‐alanine residues from l‐serine, formation of lysinoalanine bridges, formation of novel N‐terminal blocking groups and oxidative decarboxylation of a C‐terminal cysteine. The genetic elements responsible for these specific modification reactions encode unique enzymes with hitherto unknown reaction mechanisms. Production of these peptides also requires accessory proteins including processing proteases, translocators of the ATP‐binding cassette transporter family, regulatory proteins and dedicated producer self‐protection mechanisms. While the principle biological activity of most type‐B lantibiotics appears to be directed at the inhibition of enzyme functions, the type‐A lantibiotics kill bacterial cells by forming pores in the cytoplasmic membrane.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
van der Meer, J. R., Polman, J., Beerthuyzen, M. M., Siezen, R. J., Kuipers, O. P., & De Vos, W. M. (1993) · Journal of Bacteriology · doi:10.1128/jb.175.9.2578-2588.1993 · Cited by 318
Cited by
Navarre, W. W., & Schneewind, O. (1999) · Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews · doi:10.1128/mmbr.63.1.174-229.1999 · Cited by 1,391
Food fermentations: Role of microorganisms in food production and preservation
Caplice, E. (1999) · International Journal of Food Microbiology · doi:10.1016/s0168-1605(99)00082-3 · Cited by 1,052
Subtilases: the superfamily of subtilisin-like serine proteases.
Siezen, R. J., & Leunissen, J. A. M. (1997) · Protein Science · doi:10.1002/pro.5560060301 · Cited by 896
Biosynthesis and Mode of Action of Lantibiotics
Chatterjee, C., Paul, M., Xie, L., & van der Donk, W. A. (2005) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr030105v · Cited by 718
Molecular mechanisms of membrane targeting antibiotics
Epand, R. M., Walker, C., Epand, R. F., & Magarvey, N. A. (2016) · Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Biomembranes · doi:10.1016/j.bbamem.2015.10.018 · Cited by 666
Metadata
- Authors
- Sahl, H., Jack, R. W., & Bierbaum, G.
- Venue
- European Journal of Biochemistry
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1995-06
- Volume
- 230
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 827-853
- ISSN
- 0014-2956 (ISSN-L)
- 1432-1033
- OpenAlex
- W1978353607
- Cited by
- 316
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 21.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Biosynthesis and Biological Activities of Lantibiotics with Unique Post‐Translational Modifications. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1432-1033.1995.0827g.x
- The paper
- Sahl, H., Jack, R. W., & Bierbaum, G. (1995). Biosynthesis and Biological Activities of Lantibiotics with Unique Post‐Translational Modifications. European Journal of Biochemistry. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1432-1033.1995.0827g.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.